sylvian1982

Sissome my inbox is getting clogged with messages about this review, I'll give you some advice Mariaelena. Don't listen to the anonymous ones. This site is full of jokers. If you want to mess things up, go ahead. It seems to me that you're cutting your own legs out from under you. Now I’m turning off notifications for further comment alerts.

Rating the review, even though it isn't necessary.

I'm generally quite wary of the "dinosaurs" of rock. For example, I read good things about the latest Rolling Stones (the band) everywhere, but in reality, I don't think I'll ever buy it. I've also read good things about Brian Wilson, but my hesitation to approach a work like that is stronger than I am. I only have Pet Sounds by the Beach Boys, which, even though I don't include it in my top ten, I find to be a lovely album. A very nice and well-contextualized review (but how do you know all these things?). From what I read, it's an album from 2004 but sounds like one from 1967?! I have many, perhaps too many gaps in the "foundations of rock." Little by little, I'm trying to fill them, even though albums from the past— not all of them, but most— sound to me like albums from the past. What can you do, it must be me. Finally, a note on Zaireeka. Is that the album made up of 4 CDs that are meant to be played simultaneously? Okay, very alternative, but come on...

Anonymous comments are the offspring of those who make them, namely, anonymous individuals.

Honest album, not exhilarating. Definitely inferior to the previous "White Ladder." This somewhat diminishes my curiosity for the new work "Life in slow motion," which I still invite someone to review.

This is an inspired album while "Holes in the Wall" is a routine album that sounds the same from beginning to end. And as you can see, despite this being a good record, it goes unnoticed even on de-baser, and I repeat that it's a shame that albums like this end so ingloriously in the depths. My rating was still 4/5, and I don't know why it became 5/5. That's fine as well, considering the ratings that usually flood this site.

In fact, I also have the cassette of Space Oddity, which also differs in the cover from the CD currently on the market. I must have bought them in the late seventies, if my memory serves me right. I also never repurchased Space Oddity on CD. Apart from the title track, I have no memories of the other songs.

Honestly, I feel too much enthusiasm for an album by Peter Gabriel that really doesn't have much of PG in it. There are some good compositions (2-3, no more), but the rest perhaps suffers from the lack of the visual part, since it was conceived as a soundtrack to support a theater show. I would say "for fans," or if you want to discover the archangel Gabriel, feel free to leave it for last.

On the nick, you can access the personal profile that each of us can change at any time as we like, while for the reviewer profile you need to click on "scrive" to access their reviews and subsequent profile. It's not that I think you're dumb, but from the tone of your questions, I think you've never been there. And if you want, you can fill it out too. Who would have thought...

X Mariaelena. You can take a look at the reviewers' profiles and the personal profiles of the de-reviewers. This way, you can get an idea of their tastes and, for those who have posted them, their dates of birth. Just click on the nickname.