R2061478

I'm not talking about economics; I'm talking about practical life and the situation of workers. Most of my friends and young relatives, for example, work off the books and are not in compliance with the law.

Comment 17 was a response to comment 12, for clarification.

So please take it easy with the insults. This is a exchange of opinions, written no less. Do we understand each other?

Oleeinar, you can't even manage to be a nuisance. :-)

Not in that sense. For example, I love my father, my brother, but also my childhood friends. But it’s not like I make love with them. I love them in the sense that I want the best for them. Do you understand? I make love with women, not with men. With men, you plan, you work, you play, and so on. Physical love is for women. The heart is also for women, but not the soul. But this is always and only my personal opinion.

@Nes: no. :-))

@Jurix: that's not heterosexual propaganda. Some call it "seduction." What women don't do to you.

It's not political propaganda, but moral. Homosexuality is a typical phenomenon of civilizations in decline (it happened with the Greeks, the Romans, and even the Mayans): when a civilization (an empire) is, let's say, "on its last legs," it has already reached the peak of its splendor and has nothing to fight for; instead of peace, a particular phenomenon occurs: people practically stop working. I'm not joking: why was there no widespread unemployment in the 50s and 60s? ... And there wasn't even widespread homosexuality like today, nor such licentious behavior from many. The civilization is in decline, and males are less combative (almost all of them...). I believe that if we just got back to work, even homosexuality would decrease. Because I have never known happy homosexuals. Cheerful ones, sure, but happy ones, no. But it's just my opinion, of course, the opinion of someone who speaks "without thinking"... :-)

Gay propaganda in my opinion. :-((

Oh, thank you. :-)