Ghemison

Dear Punisher, my desire for approval has nothing to do with it (I still thank those who leave positive, friendly, and polite comments, just as I try to respond to the more negative ones). Here we write reviews, and reviews are not stories or poems; they are a form of criticism, not ethics. Thus, there is an exact way to write which I attempt to approach. When I have reached it, then perhaps I will write reviews that are different from yours, or those of ..caz.. or SC (even if I find it ideologically incorrect, since creation usually does not apply to critical reviews or essays). Do you think perhaps that Celine, Burroughs, Kerouac, and Calvino began subverting the rules of writing from the very start of their literary careers? Of course not: first they practiced, and then they arrived at their most personal masterpieces. Otherwise, they would have ended up like the Futurists, and we can see how they are regarded in the literary field.

go ahead, dear carriage breaker, and you'll hear what a beautiful sound... you'll hear...

Dear Punisher, my review is impersonal because that's how I want it; I like to write reviews the right way. Reviews that could be found in a newspaper and not necessarily on the internet. After all, it's easy to write however the hell we want; the difficult part is writing correctly, my dear... If the band in question lasts for two albums, tough luck for them; for me, that's more than valid. And then, what the hell can someone who calls himself The Punisher say, when in the photos on his blog he looks like HellBoy... I thank you as always, my dear SC of my (un)trust, your comments always stand out for their correctness and wit.

wlo spam against ---caz---

However, I think the review came through cut, and I'm sending it back. At least before "Festival..." there was "In the wake of Punk..."

I thought I would be covered in insults for choosing such a vulgar group, and instead the de-commentators (at least those present here) prove to be always democratic and attentive... What a nice thing.

The punctuation of the comment above is rather hypothetical (incorrect). I apologize.

Dear swordsman, for me, good Roots is truly a monster: he has a very unique rapping style and his beats kick the ass of a good part of contemporary American or British hip-hop. Then, for these very reasons, he might not be to everyone's taste, but there is a nice "de gustibus" here. And anyway, you cannot criticize the quality of the work, and by the way, I believe that our friend still has excellent room for improvement.

I am immensely grateful to the de-donzelles Kosmo and Fosca!

what a crap review