Voto:
Honestly, I appreciated (the more past things) watching videos in this world, but I don't have a full-time job.
Voto:
fundamental but left somewhere you don't remember, a few kilos of vinyl collecting dust, if not used completely useless. Almost like my person, indeed I remain, to be honest, I am more useless. Then they have two sides, I have one side. A condemnation.
Voto:
I don't love classic neo-folk; it's now a stale genre. This band from Rome adds new sounds (new for neo-folk, to be clear). These new/not-so-new ingredients broaden the boundaries of a genre that had little new to say anymore. It's a beautiful album, without necessarily confining it to a genre cage.
Voto:
I was sweating and then I heard the Cramps and I sweated blood. Deluded, it was red wine.
Voto:
Iggy sings the '60s, over everything falls a dark shroud that stinks of the '70s, but here I believe we are still in a transitional phase in terms of sound, I think. Heroin has left glimpses of light.
Voto:
great record, light but not trivial, perfect cover, sensual hammond
Voto:
very beautiful cover, the music (those few moments I felt) brought me back to Italian soundtracks with roots in easy jazz, all to be explored because it seems very beautiful. A vote of confidence for the album, Review to read
Voto:
Just a couple of untitled CDs, just the band name, that's enough for me.
Voto:
I approached it with skepticism, but in my opinion, it’s not bad. Here, the voice is a sore spot; I would have experimented with it. I’m aware that you shouldn’t care at all, but I am completely against your opinion.
Voto:
the contradictions without a possible explanation. The page is well done even though it deals with a group that I only liked in the beginning, then for what concerns the nothing. So I actually can't even speak ill of it.