Simply and completely in agreement.
What immediately stands out, or rather, what is heard, is the urgency to communicate something new, something different but already partially felt, the need to refresh a music style, rock and roll, which at the time had about seven years of life and was already showing signs of fatigue and a tendency toward conformity, typical aspects of a society such as the American one that, despite inventing new and revolutionary things, tends to categorize, standardize, and archive them very, very quickly...
Being British and, therefore, less accustomed to absolute novelties, coming from a society where the old and nostalgic customs of the late empire were more to be avoided and destroyed than those to be embraced, was perhaps the true ace up the sleeve for all the Beatles...
And then, ladies and gentlemen, shall we mention how these Beatles of that time continuously paid tribute, through cover versions or their originals, to black vocal groups, especially female ones? Not to mention that, for two more albums, they would plunder the "black" repertoire of the time, reinterpreting songs like "Twist and Shout" as well as "You Really Got a Hold on Me" or "Money," chewing them up, crumbling them, and demolishing them only to recreate them in such a personal way that even today not everyone knows which song is theirs and which one is a cover...
For further comments, please refer to my cousin from Padania,
@[IlConte]...
Well done,
@[DDQ], I'm going to DeAmarti, damn it.