CosmicJocker

DeRank : 14,60 • DeAge™ : 3641 days

Voto:
As Ken Shiro said to a dying Caio: "Technique is not enough. I defeated you because you never evolved and remained confined your whole life on the Island of Demons."

Is it a coincidence that, to glorify an album by DT, only technique is discussed, forgetting that in art the "right point" is usually the wrong one?

P.S. The singer has always been embarrassing...
Voto:
More storytelling than your other pages (which were more focused on the visualization of sound), in any case a beautiful page.
Voto:
The sound of the track is cool, I don’t know if a whole album would be right for me…

You are always very thorough (maybe even too much for my tastes)…
Voto:
"The greatest Italian writer": no, definitely not for me.
Yet the themes he tackles should be included in mandatory schooling (oh dear. Perhaps they already are, but they remain incredibly relevant).
A note of praise for mentioning the film by the one who - indeed - is the greatest actor OF ITALIAN CINEMA...
Voto:
"The label 'generational' is often abused and out of place."

I really think that the label 'generational' makes no sense (nor has it ever made sense, nor will it ever).

This "substantial inability to cope with the world" is common to a slice of people from every time and latitude. We talk about "vacuum," "indeterminacy," "unease," or "narcissism," trying to pigeonhole without a generation, forgetting that these criteria can easily be applied to some people in their forties, fifties, and so on.

It's like saying that the twenty-somethings of the late '60s were all drug addicts or that the Swiss are all skilled businesspeople (and they always arrive on time).

There is no AVERAGE thirty-year-old; there are stories about thirty-year-olds. Each with its own specificities and nuances.

Maybe the film is a masterpiece, but if it is, it certainly doesn't owe that to the fact that it claims to be 'generational.'
Voto:
What stands out most is the intensity of the gaze.
I can't quite grasp which of these aspects emerges more prominently:

A) The glittering foresight of the fine intellectual.
B) The resolve of the skilled statesman who never loses heart.
C) A deep sensitivity barely held back, as state reasoning always requires a certain rational approach to the matters of life.
D) Empty vacuum.
Voto:
Is this it was a great album: it went straight to the point and arrived with skill.
Then, unexpectedly, they exploded, amidst rehashed ideas and endless boredom.
P.S.
The garden gnome career is not one of the most disreputable that comes to mind (so good old Julian could save both the goat and the cabbage by trying his hand at that).
P.P.S.
Almo, you’re always at the top.
Voto:
Well, the title seems like a porn category to me.
Voto:
But why does it all have to become A FUCKING SERIES?!?

Anyway, 5 to you and Calcare, I guess? By the way, the strips I was reading in Internazionale were cool..
Voto:
Even his best film? I say this because, in my opinion, since "This must be the place," our director has somewhat twisted in on himself (though I haven’t seen the series "young pope" yet)...
Yes, of course: there are always striking images, captivating characters, and a zoom on the ever-walking grotesque that always refer to an extraordinary score, but it seems to me like just settling back into the same "formula"...
After all, a winning/selling formula doesn’t change.