Mirror's_Chest

To answer your question, I would say that "1984," leaving aside artistic judgments, unfortunately represents one of the many alleged "works of fiction" that, due to their disarming analysis of reality (in this case, the future, if we talk about Orwell's times), have been wholesale instrumentalized by the market and the system precisely to distract the masses from the authentic message of the work. Few have truly read it, and even fewer realize that the reality it describes has, for quite some time now, been a tangible thing, which now represents something even more monstrous. The story, if it still makes sense to call it that, exists only as a form of propaganda promulgated by the System, in this case, the educational system; the language in the famous global village is increasingly constricted and impoverished by a mass culture that has erected ignorance as a true model of life. Not coincidentally, English, the most spoken and known language in the world, along with a few others (Hebrew, for example), represents the poorest language in terms of vocabulary in absolute terms and continues relentlessly towards further impoverishment thanks to telecommunications. Not to mention the Media and the entire operation of mental disintegration that they surgically perpetuate continuously, with the full support of the overarching establishment; in the age of the Internet, the same, with dozens of journalists erected for the occasion to refute and pollute what could dangerously prove to be the truth (take a look at Paolo Attivissimo's blog), not to mention the thousands of distractions purposefully constructed so that people never find the time to think about what happens an inch from their nose. And then violence, terror, war, murder, fear: there is always an enemy to fight, there is always a war ready to break out, but we never know why, or at least, we only know why at very few times, or too late, and nothing ever changes; we are too busy spending our time erecting monuments to our ego that the very pursuit of what is right loses its meaning in a post-Darwinian society, which has wisely taught us that the only way is self-preservation, selfishness, a wise Malthusian fable proposed through a "scientific" intertwining, the strong win over the weak and above all, there is no purpose, there is no way out other than the prison of the senses. Not that it’s any better on the other side: increasingly imposing (and increasingly contradictory) religions pop up like mushrooms, and it seems that just gathering together on a Sunday in church is enough to resolve things. It is not God who is dead but man, his intrinsic common sense and everything connected to it, consciousness first and foremost: this is the shocking reality of "1984," for many, just a nice book to write an essay about at school. It's a bit of the paradox in which Che Guevara finds himself after his death: after a life firmly against capitalism, now, printed on every possible t-shirt and gadget, he represents its most unconditioned exaltation...

The whole film is the dialogue between the student "he's smart but doesn't apply himself" and the prof/Redford.

A tide of exceptional actors for a film that is the state of the art of the director, in the opinion of the writer.

I've been feeling shattered these days, it's terrible.
First track badly stolen from Dredg.

for HARDCOCK: I don't say anything because I'm not a doctor; I simply express some facts (all the people who have died and whom I've known personally, by the way) and for which science has evidently been unable to do anything. Then I find that the internet is full of people writing investigative books of this kind, obviously discredited because they're not taken seriously even by mistake, and maybe I can even guess the reasons why. I try to educate myself on important things, plain and simple: and as far as I know so far, I stick to ideas that don't correspond at all to what the media and everything else tell you and lead you to believe, whether it's out of stubbornness or due to misguided readings, as you might think. The fact is that the facts speak for themselves.
Do you want to change the subject? Let’s talk a bit about an event that happened to me this summer: my cousin suddenly starts feeling unwell and decides to see a psychologist, perhaps for depression. At some point, they prescribe him a medication. Everything seems to be going well. Just a few days later, in the midst of a completely normal day, he jumps off a 40-meter bridge, two and a half hours from my house, around Cesena (in Verghereto, to be precise). And lo and behold, I discover that many antidepressant medications induce strong suicidal temptations. You might not see any connection; unfortunately, I do. But of course, I'm the idiot here, and especially he is!

And the funny thing is that the people who criticize the book haven't even read it... go figure, in the end who cares.
I can say with absolute certainty that I don't know anyone close to me who has fallen ill with this type of disease and who has gotten away with chemo.
That's it.
Whether the so-called "herbs" (but it's not just about herbs) may or may not work, I have no idea.
For sure, if I got sick, I'd rather die than fill myself with all this crap!

Sure, here's the translation:
just alone.
In short, quite a nice perspective!
So, if you allow me, I believe I have enough elements to nurture a few small doubts.

For HARDCOCK: I don’t think I'm spreading “disinformation” as you say, but simply writing about a book that struck me, nothing more, nothing less. By the way, have you recently heard that Veronesi has strongly supported the installation of "termovalorizzatori" (polluting incinerators because they produce fine particles), claiming their absolute safety from an environmental standpoint? And yes, there are quite a few documents; soon they should be publishing another review of the same author for "Il tradimento della medicina," where several issues regarding studies, statistics, etc., are laid out, along with a detailed explanation of everything that Dr. Mondini's association had to endure from the state and lobby as well. Don’t you think it’s a bit unreasonable to publish "other sites" that present completely different statistics? Tomorrow I could dismantle the belief that Santa Claus doesn't exist by posting a link to a site that proves he does. Every piece of information has behind it one or more interests and consequently, it's obvious to find people who support or oppose a certain topic depending on their personal gains. Try looking online for data on the famous aspartame, for instance: you will find dozens of studies proving its dangers (it's carcinogenic), yet no "mainstream" site asserts the same, not to mention TV or newspapers. However, coincidentally, our "healthy" modern foods are full of it, from chewing gum to soft drinks, and guess what, cancer cases have increased exponentially (along with pollution, environmental destruction, etc...). According to this reasoning, aspartame is absolutely healthy just because the sources that claim otherwise are "unofficial." I’m not saying that sites like disinformazione.it should be taken 100% seriously, but merely suggesting to look at things from multiple perspectives and not to judge based on "beliefs": being informed means this. If tomorrow I read a book that 100% disconfirms the "disinformation" provided by Mr. Mondini, I'll be happy to have learned something. For now, if you want to know what I think, if I were to fall seriously ill, I wouldn’t even consider getting chemotherapy: besides reading this and many other articles (debernardi.splinder.it), all those I know in my tiny town (not even 10,000 inhabitants, located near a lake in the green, not in a city full of "termovalorizzatori") who became ill and subsequently treated this way have died after horrific suffering: my grandfather (August 2002, colon cancer, died after surgery), a dear uncle of mine (pancreatic cancer), the mother of a long-time friend (after the first series of treatments, the apparently cured cancer returned in a more massive form, invading her whole body and obviously killing her), the father and mother of two of my classmates, several schoolmates, even a handful of acquaintances living in my own neighborhood, and the numbers continue to rise exponentially, both for new patients and for those, unfortunately, succumbing to these therapies. As I write, two of my best friends have to deal with both their mothers and fathers in the same situations listed above, and I learned that even one of my former teachers fell gravely ill. A schoolmate of mine died of cancer at 16 years old when I was still in high school, obviously not before undergoing the entire series of "treatments" that left him utterly depleted. The father of a dear long-time friend, while he was still alive, underwent the usual series of "miraculous" treatments that led to tripled metastases in just a year: dying (not before suffering horrific pains, obviously) he left behind four children without a father and a single mother. All of this, I repeat, in a poor little suburban village where the most you can find in terms of pollution is a piece of litter on the ground, and consequently, the incidence of such diseases should be very low. So, if you allow me, I believe I have enough elements to nurture at least some small doubt.

wow, even 1 for having written a wrong name..!

for OMAHACELEB: I speak as a novice but at the same time as someone who has developed a fairly deep understanding of the topic, and I share the belief that there isn't a world that is all white or all black. It's clear that certain data speaks volumes, and it definitely leans to one side and not the other, the so-called "official" side, according to which this type of disease remains incurable when there are thousands of cases that contradict it, many of which are described in detail in this book (I INVITE YOU TO READ IT!!!), including interviews, testimonies, and official data available to everyone. Misinformation comes from the system, not from people who have to live with a death sentence like Alessiani for discovering an effective cure for cancer at practically no cost... guys, wake up.