giola

Clichés, truisms, rhetoric: hahahahahahahahah! Puniscier, you are a great comedian, let me tell you! (today I'm in a controversial mood)

Oh yes, Puniscier, your reviews are actually useful instead. But do me a favor!!!

Naturally, I'm only referring to two albums, this one and Alternative 4; I don't know the others.

"that wears us out just at the thought of listening to it for a second time": ha ha ha, you confirm my suspicions, the albums you review you only listen to once and throw down your review like a middle school homework assignment. When tearing it apart, you always follow the same script. What a drag! I haven't heard the album, I like the first four Peter Gabriel albums quite a bit and for me he has already created his masterpiece, Passion, the rest doesn't matter.

I like Anathema, but I find them a bit one-dimensional at times. I prefer Katatonia.

of course I wanted to write "philosophy" without "a" in front :/

Sorry, I thought you had given a score to the film, but instead there’s no rating; maybe that equates to zero, I don’t know. The fact remains, however, that your judgment is still extremely negative.

I’m very sorry, reviewer, but your analysis seems to me a jumble of inconsistent clichés... If I have to take your reasoning into account, then I couldn’t have watched Galaxy Quest with Weaver without criticizing the director by saying: "Oh, he resurrected Ripley, what a script!" So now Weaver can’t act in sci-fi because she did Alien? A director can’t shoot a war scene now because it reminds of Apocalypse Now? One of the ugliest films in history? I mean, what film did you watch? Did you see Armageddon, Independence Day, Battle for Terra, for example, just to stick to sci-fi? If you give this a one, what should you give to those atrocities I mentioned? Bowman, nice Kubrickian nickname, but you see, sci-fi cinema can afford to progress with the technologies used in Avatar; it’s not a philosophy like 2001: A Space Odyssey, and Cameron is not Kubrick; he doesn’t have the same pretensions, he just needs to entertain (and he does it well, dear Bowman) with a minimum of plausible and shareable content; after all, that’s exactly how Americans behave everywhere in the world; they have Na’Vi to “educate,” rob, and massacre all over the place. Look, I’m the first to detest the mega blockbuster movies, all action and special effects, and I reproach Cameron in this film for not delving enough into the habits, the daily life of the Na’Vi, for putting in too much action and little tension, but this is a matter of personal taste and need that doesn’t make me lose objectivity regarding the overall value of the film.

Nice movie, the review is a bit trivial; I could read this stuff anywhere online. If you have nothing original to say, don't write yet another review in a month about the same subject. Sorry, huh!

I don't know if they moved her, but when I saw her, she was mortified by the presence of the guards on the sides (unfortunately necessary) and at the end of a hall filled with paintings three, four times larger... I think it would be appropriate to display her in a room all to herself... after all, she deserves it: she is THE Painting. It seems that when Raphael saw her for the first time in Leonardo's studio, he began to cry in a fit of uncontrollable emotion and excitement: perhaps it's a legend, I don't know, but all of this is very beautiful.