fiquata

look Tobby, I couldn’t care less why Taurus stuffed this "rewiew" with all these horrible words. It feels strange to me, and I don’t think it’s a coincidence that all this happened on a "rewiew" of Silverstein. Do you know Silverstein? I do, I have a 15-year-old cousin who listens to this crap (thankfully she’ll grow out of it), and with this, we return to the basic concept: speaking poorly means thinking poorly. That’s what I meant :) try listening to Silverstein and then come back to dispute my theory. just kidding, just kidding... I'm off now. Over and out. bye... I mean, "bye"

I remembered Italian but not the words, and in fact, I haven't watched Palombella Rossa in quite some time. Anyway, the basic concept of that entire journey into the world of words was that speaking poorly means thinking poorly, which seems to flow from the lips of Moretti... even if he doesn't say it, it doesn't matter: this is how I think.

Listen, I have very little time for polemics... and I’m not even interested. The point isn’t the Italian equivalent; the point is that those are words thrown around to sound impressive, which just happen to always be in English. Never German, French, or Spanish, but always English and always completely avoidable. Geenoo understood the reference... even kitsch (of German origin) doesn’t have an exact Italian equivalent, so what? We are Italians; let’s try to think in Italian because thinking well means expressing oneself well and being understood, even if it means using thirty more characters to say something that could be expressed in one "foreign" word, and it’s not a matter of snobbery... a computer is still a computer, not a calcolatore. The world is trying to learn Italian, and we are trying to forget it: quite funny, really. And it’s well known that those people who throw in foreign words haphazardly are often the ones who don’t seriously speak English and end up not even knowing how to speak Italian. Anyway, the equivalent of "chorus," for example, is the much less exotic "ritornello." :)

"five-piece," "chapter," "sound," "heavy," "featuring," "screaming," "title-track," "platter," "breakdown," "refrain," "chorus," "opus," "comeback." You speak poorly because you think poorly. But what is it? It sounds like one of those "briefings" among thirty-something entrepreneurs from Milan. Italian is important. They totally suck.

Okay, I really liked it a lot.

I don't know... I saw them sharing the stage with Lightning Bolt, Les Savy Fav, Shellac, Wooden Shijps, and Om, and they didn't look out of place... on the contrary, those who played after them were really shaken and were seriously drunk :)

Hehe... I saw them live in London. The singer will never be a real animal like Rollins & Co, but I assure you he puts in a lot of effort :) Anyway, live they make the ground shake and have a devastating impact, incredible sounds. I didn't include the Killdozer in the list because this album, to my ears, is purely Noise... for "Hope for Man," which is more structured and bluesy, they all fit in nicely, lined up two by two. In "Hope for Man" there are a couple of riffs borrowed from "Burl," but these guys steal with such genuineness that I find them likable... and then they are a bunch of clowns: a reason to appreciate them a bit more.

I promise that if we sit close together, I'll take a shower.

<< what does it matter >> Ah, debt for you too. But, in September, for the makeup classes, will we sit close? :)

testo: proare