brusko

DeRank : 1,61
DeAge™ : 6431 days • Here since 30 october 2008
Creedence Clearwater Revival Willy and the Poor Boys
Voto:
It ain't me, it ain't me, I'm no senator's son, son. It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no fortunate one, no.
Ac/Dc High Voltage
Voto:
t n t, ohi ohi ohi, t n t, ohi ohi ohi, t n t, ohi ohi ohi I'm Dynamite...
King Crimson Red
Voto:
Well, at 14 I still had to learn how to read, so I can only say, good for you. I only know their first album, which I recently bought to try to get into prog a bit. Great album that, great band this, but I think my prog phase has already ended; I preferred to go back to the old Rawk&Rawll.
R.E.M. Document
R.E.M. Document
10 apr 09
Voto:
Great album. Among other things, the CD edition includes not only some remixes and unreleased tracks but also a beautiful unplugged live version of The One I Love, truly excellent.
R.E.M. Automatic For The People
Voto:
Great album. My favorite record of the '90s. The 5 in the review is also for the choice of the sample, Drive, my favorite track by R.E.M., taken at the peak of its beauty, that is, when the electric guitar kicks in, stunning.
AA.VV. From Dusk Till Dawn - Soundtrack
Voto:
"Welcome to the world of slaves" - "No, thanks, I've already had a wife"
John Fogerty Revival
Voto:
Great John, for me the Creedence Clearwater are still the best American rock band, no question about it. I don't know his solo album, but come on, he was the soul, the undisputed leader of the CCR, and he has always been an extraordinary musician. Amazing voice, excellent guitarist. I've seen some recent videos on YouTube, and despite no longer being young, he still has a great presence on stage; in fact, there are some where he duets with Springsteen, and he outshines him. This is a true great of rock. Well done, excellent choice!
AC/DC Live
AC/DC Live
7 apr 09
Voto:
I would like to respond to Defender1. I’ll start with the last question. Yes, there was a need for it because if there are 123 of Death Magnetic, or 342 of Chinese Democracy, then 3 of this one are nothing; in fact, we could use a few more to balance it out. Then you say yourself that it’s an excellent album from a musical standpoint, well, doesn't that seem significant to you? Personally, I consider that the most important thing. Sure, it might be inferior to the first live album, but come on, that one was of absolute perfection. Yet, one live album that’s just over fifty minutes long was perhaps a bit too little to represent the live dimension of one of the greatest bands of all time, don’t you think? It’s perfectly normal for them to have made another live album. In fact, compared to bands of equal significance, they’ve actually released quite a few fewer live albums. It was undoubtedly a well-thought-out choice, but what's wrong with that? At the time, they were back on top, they did an impressive tour, and rightly decided to put together a live album because evidently it was the ideal moment. Everyone thinks about making money; they aren’t doing rock for charity. Commercial strategies have always existed; the important thing is that there’s good music at the core. The rest seem to me like really irrelevant and trivial arguments.
Rolling Stones Shine A Light
Voto:
Here Cristina Aguilera. And now they're also giving Biagio Antonacci permission to shamelessly recycle the riff from Start Me Up. Hey! Jagger, Richards, what the hell have you been drinking?
Deep Inside Dark Again
Voto:
Yes Jurix, but actually, mine was not a criticism of you, but an admission of ignorance. I think you are right to do certain reviews because you spread musical culture, and that is a great thing.