!oasis Banned

"l'avveop" stands for L'AVEVO (somebody tells me it's better if I go to bed, go..)

Well, I'm instead trying to get started. Do you feel like advising me on an effective "modus operandi" (assuming that's what it's called anyway...) - for ENEA btw. I haven't told you yet, anyway. Far too implied, MUNIFICA review! (like all your others, by the way)

Damn, how could I have written "meriterevvero," obviously it was with 2 Bs (I told you before that I'm illiterate!!)

"now the masterpieces of chrome are all there" - "trinitamente d'accordo" but what about the others, for example, "3d from the sun" etc. this crazy irreverent duo has also done other things, perhaps less devastating but equally reconnectable to their cacophonic and tearing aesthetic (I’m singing it to myself, it's true, but don't ask for a review from an illiterate like me!!) - which truly deserves a nice de-review.
p.s.: btw. I can't quote the work since I haven't yet had the fortune (or misfortune?) of hearing it - but is it true that one of the two members was found in his home a month after his death??

I believe it might have been understood anyway. I wanted to say TRACCIARNE not "tracciarnr."

I'm "listening" to the album right now, the review couldn't outline a more accurate and faithful profile, but damn, it almost seems like you take self-satisfaction in the "prophetic" warnings you outline in the last two lines of your chilling critique, and that's exactly why your summary terrifies me even more!!

Perhaps not among the band's masterworks, it is nonetheless appreciable (in my opinion, it even takes a small step forward compared to the eponymous debut). Furthermore, one point I'd like to make is that, compared to various contemporary bands, the Yes of that time stood out clearly, if for no other reason than their avoidance of the routine of flooding their early works with a plethora of covers (only 2 in this album, the same number as in the previous one, and moreover their "Every Little Thing" takes from The Beatles solely the initial riff, then develops in a totally different way... even the title of the song is different!). Additionally, the lineup of the first two LPs was not yet the one that soon after would place them among the so-called "supergroups."
The review is objectively very well done (if nothing else, a nice dream; hopefully I had such dreamlike visions during sleep... of the right kind?? who knows...).

I give the album a vote of confidence and I've said it all, as the great Peppino used to say. However, I confess that after talking about it so much (even if I swear it's been negative..) I'm starting to feel the urge to listen to it again; I might just go visit the "mule." It's my favorite band despite this disappointing misstep, and my NICK—chosen by the way, purely for provocative purposes—X EDITORS: by the way, when do you plan to publish my reviews on Oasis and Blur?? hi hi hi! (now they might send us...)

Always from eMule, there is a sort of subtitle next to the track that says it is the sound commentary of "merit cup spot" (for example), and even the opening theme of the show "NON SOLO MODA" (!). Anyway, I’m surprised that a minimalist author can also be so "romantic" and passionate (if that’s how you can say it - certainly much less impersonal compared to a Steve Reich or a Glass…).

For the record, I’m currently listening to "deep waters" – I hope the "mule" hurries up with the rest of the tracks, not all at once though or it might end up like the donkey in the fable with the sponges, hi hih hi! (bad joke, I know, if we can even call it that..) I’ll give a rating to the album when (if) I’ve downloaded the other songs – a bit short of a review in my opinion, too bad because it’s well-structured (as my former tourism technique professor would have said..) and well-expressed, anyway I’ll give it a 4, off we go.