panapp

Not a bad review, but somewhat lacking (the quotes are beautiful, though). A film that doesn't need any more words: ABSOLUTE MASTERPIECE of cinematic art for writing, directing, acting, psychological characterization of the characters, cinematography, and imaginative power in creating images and transforming a joyful fairy tale into the darkest of fairy tales. Unforgettable is the scene of the children in the boat on the river with the starry sky.

Great review, brilliant film. To wait for a musical of the same quality level, we will have to wait until 2002 with Rob Marshall's "Chicago" (clearly a child of "Cabaret" and Bob Fosse).

Wikipedia, huh? Curtis is also the creator and writer of Mr. Bean, that brilliant TV show. Unfortunately, I haven't seen this movie despite really wanting to, and I blindly believe in this review that praises it with a nice 4.

Nice review and a very famous film, but I have yet to have the pleasure of seeing it.

When video games had gameplay ideas, and not just mega-graphics at 345678906 bits.

@sexyajax: if in comment #12 you were referring to me... no, I'm not from Milan, I live in Ascoli Piceno. Every time I've been to Milan, I've found myself in front of "Ago, filo e nodo," and it seems to me a very well-made divertissement, nice and even intelligent; without a doubt, the best among the enlargements made by Oldenburg. That said, it is still one of the countless possible practical versions derived from a single idea. Example: Duchamp invented the readymade, yes, but he didn't rely on that for the subsequent years of his life until his death; instead, he repeatedly reinvented and surpassed himself. Oldenburg has been doing the same thing for decades (very nice and fun things to see, sure, but fundamentally all the same).

Oldenburg has done better, and especially this specific work is part of an infinite series where the conceptual idea is one and the practical realizations are thousands, one of which stands in front of the Cadorna metro station in Milan (which is much more beautiful and much more significant than this "Spoon and Cherry").

@Ezekiel25_17: you haven't understood a single thing I wrote to you in #340, even though I told you that your phrase "the essential condition for work is freedom" is absolutely and necessarily shareable if placed in a political/syndical context... the problem is that you don't put it in any context, but rather use it as a catchy phrase like Berluska would, to make the old and the ignorant emotional who then actually go and vote for him. BUT LET'S DROP THIS DISCUSSION, it's better that way. The point is that you are trying to convince us that you are right not so much because of your inconsistent arguments, but because since you are this way and that way then you can and are legitimized to say certain things and so we have to believe you; however, your social condition is not a reason to spout nonsense. You're turning climbing on mirrors into an Olympic discipline. Try to think: homosexuals have been fighting for decades (they would have liked to do it for centuries, but you know how it is...) for their rights trying to explain their condition, and then you come along and because you met a cheerful gay at school, though not a happy one, you allow yourself to say that all the theories formulated about homosexuality are crap and that you instead know how things really are (???): do you realize the absolute absurdity of this? I already know the answer: no.

There was a word to enter to get infinite money... what was it? I can't remember...

@Defender1: as you saw in the comments of the review of "Psychopathia Sexualis," I completely agree with you. Here in "Snuff 2000," we're on the heavy side, but it doesn't seem like there were any problems because this comic came after "Psychopathia Sexualis," and so, evidently, those who took Vacca to court at the time understood that this would (rightly) end the same way again.