Voto:
Well, they might not be milestones, but putting together this group of D'Alessio, Pausini, and Ferro is really a joke. They've made some good tracks and have a decent sound, and in my opinion, they have potential. D'ALESSIO PAUSINI FERRO!!??? Please, I can understand your frustration, but let’s not say nonsense.
Voto:
the review is good, I have use your illusion 1 and I've listened to it maybe 3 times in 15 years, I find them trivial, boring, and repetitive, but de gustibus obviously, the only question I would like to ask you is what social and cultural movement they would have pushed forward, considering that shortly after grunge would have swept them away, promoting very different ideals.
Voto:
Ah ah ah ah ah!! The name of this band is quite a statement, good suggestion.
Voto:
SUPERGRANTNICHOLAS!
Voto:
Hi Bonny, no, I didn't really like the review, regardless of my opinion on these Rolling Stones of the album in question.
Voto:
Great review! The rating is for Rino Gaetano in general because I don't know the album, apart from "A Kathmandu," "La 1100," and "Tu forse non essenzialmente tu," which are already quite indicative of his style.
Voto:
I don't know... I've never been convinced by the psychedelic version of the Rolling Stones... it seems more like an imitation of the Beatles to me, and in fact, they later returned to their established style with Beggar's Banquet or however it's written.
Voto:
This review is a bit cold... it feels like they asked you to do a homework assignment!
Voto:
yes yes, nice review, I have no idea who they are
Voto:
good review, but you could have reviewed some real De André albums instead, and giving 5 to a compilation... so what do you give to Creuza de Ma?