UhuhPanicoUhuh

beautiful, if only you weren't mistaken..

I mean you can freely call me a mule and I can’t mess up your nickname?! This is quite something. Look, Pannzzoone, I think I understand what you mean but I’m not entirely convinced, to avoid misunderstandings, could you please rewrite comments 80 and 81 in Italian? And stop attributing actions to me that I didn’t perform, what do the books I’ve read have to do with it? I cling to the quote because I haven’t had the pleasure of knowing it, so that testimony is definitely better than my imagination, but you need to stop fixating on the first sentence of the quote, and move on [or reread my post n°52 (the part addressed to you, where I respond to your future post #80)]!

I run to love you! :)

I'll look for this instead..

Beautiful! I also listened to the links, what can I say... I'll try to listen to them again tonight.

Actually, let me share my thoughts. Reviews that describe commercial pop music or any work created for easy money should rightly be commented on in a vulgar or offensive manner towards those who produce it, since this is a community of people who love "music." If a beautiful woman happens to be in a good, serious group, then those discussions start after about 50 passionate comments on the subject, and that’s fine. I also don't see the necessity to discuss Pausini (or anyone like her) in this context. Let's elevate ourselves. Arinotte!

Because what else do Lacuna Coil offer? :) Polly Jean is quite a hottie for me. Good night!

But in fact, I'm not here to promote the cause of Marylin = woman of easy virtue. I'm trying to say that your reaction to the first comment was a bit exaggerated; certainly the timing was not great, but it's not that much of a blasphemous statement, composed and figurative. I care relatively little about Monroe in the end, but unfortunately, it seems that it still works this way.

Here’s Azzo, go look at the definitions, but don’t throw the whole masculinity thing at me; I’m saying something else. In fact, I don't think I said "Kennedy is a hunk," you said that. I'm not arguing, I'm just comparing, the jokes were jokes a bit to divert. And don’t worry, even your posts speak for themselves. :) @Panzuni: the term superficial simplifies the whole quote, but mainly the last part. I repeat, let’s try to go step by step. <<he thought he could grasp the idea of a book... in just a few pages...>> maybe he was bored or simply couldn’t go further. <<Devoid of any cultural pretension, she never felt the need to worry about things that didn’t overwhelm her>> The first part, as Azzo says, speaks for itself, while the closing doesn’t bring out any elements that leave even the slightest opening for any meticulous quality, other than provoking sweet and delightful reactions in many animals who drooled just from seeing half a knee, a silly smile, and a winking eyelash. But in the end, do you feel clever yet ignorant, or cultured and stupid? :)

the third person no Punny :)