desade

It seems like an obsession... anyway, "Young Frankenstein" by Mel Brooks is much better.

I have always maintained the thesis that there is space for everyone in every field; there must be. Even here on Deb, it’s natural that everyone has the opportunity to express themselves. But honestly, does this seem like the way to write a review? Are we sure you watched the film in its entirety? I don't think it's the best in its filmography either and it's certainly not among my favorite directors, but to say it’s terrible, no. There’s no mention of the plot or the main character (who, by the way, is an epigone of the thriller genre), no references to the settings, no judgments on the special effects, no nod to the "musical" component, just a brief footnote to inform us that "Sweeney Todd" is typically Burtonian. And luckily so. Imagine if he had recalled Steven Spielberg. But then, for you, what does "Burtonian" mean? What are you referring to? You talk about gratuitous violence; it's actually a love story stained with blood. So how would you judge "Last Tango in Paris"? Discount pornography? Of kids in striped tights, "bimbeminkia"; you will find plenty of them, and they will be able to devalue a work by reinterpreting it solely through their mild, stupid, ignorant perspective. But that doesn’t mean the work itself is mild, stupid, and ignorant.

WORLD MARCO: Just to set the record straight, Michael Jackson had vitiligo; it was a necessary choice for someone like him who showcased his body on stage (At most, one could criticize his cosmetic surgery, but today who would dare?). As for the allegations of pedophilia, I have my doubts that you were in court behind him or that you’ve read the reports regarding it. If we want to rely on "rumors," then we should also remember that "rumor" that whispered about a father who, to make it in Hollywood as a screenwriter, tried to push his son well beyond. Fortunately, at least in Jackson's case, there’s the (great) music to speak for itself, and that should be our focus—only that.

The tones of the review are too enthusiastic; after all, the mere fact that you signed up to review a Robbie Williams album with that nickname raises quite a few doubts regarding the levels of objectivity. In any case, "Bodies" is truly horrible; personally, I believe that from "Intensive care" onwards, it has been quite below par. However, in the pop realm, there is worse, and a lot of it. "Escapology" is definitely an album that deserves attention; if one prefers exclusively another genre of music, then there are no saints. Those who oppose Williams' existence in the international music circuit really shouldn't open this page, in the name of consistency (and especially for logic). But the insults are sure to come. It seems to me, furthermore, that the worst is yet to come...

Well done, well done, and well done again.

I haven't seen the movie but I will take care of that immediately. I don't believe that revealing the ending can undermine the value of this page. Personally, knowing how a film ends doesn't diminish my desire to watch it, especially if it's a classic or an older movie. Moreover, it gets a bit frustrating not to be able to reveal the ending for the sake of a specific and complete analysis. It's quite understandable for those who get upset, though.

It's a shame I lost it...fun but lacking review.

you are right but it's not a small mistake, it's a real blunder... ashes abound on my head...

I’m waiting for the next "Mine vaganti," hopefully. Ozpetek has good potential, but in his filmography, he can't claim the "pearl" just yet, in my opinion. Let’s hope it’s not just an everlasting promise.

indeed