supersoul

For me, it has always been overrated as the best album by Jefferson Airplane; they had made an impact during the full summer of love with "Surrealistic Pillow," their true psychedelic album from 1967. It's no coincidence that lawyer Oscar Z. Acosta, in Hunter S. Thompson's book, asks to commit suicide to "White Rabbit," which, along with "Somebody to Love," was among the gems of that album where Jerry Garcia also played. "Volunteers" is not a five for me; too many rhetorical anthems at a moment when the hippie season was falling apart.

@blech...San Paolo Stadium July 1982, Steve Vai was on guitar. He even played "na tazzulella e'cafè"...

Sharonas was too much of a gentleman in not mentioning the word theft in the case of Jimmy Page during his time with the Yardbirds, and as far as I know, there has never been any remorse from the recidivist. I remember Holmes's version, with a voice oddly reminiscent of Plant but much more acid, as if it came from the other side. And if I remember correctly, the rest of the album doesn't live up to this folk-psychedelic treat.

Paraphrasing the Trap, I completely agree halfway with purpulan; it’s not that the value of a band is measured by the number of asses they can move, especially considering that if the F***d Up had played thirty years ago in a hardcore social center, they would have caught more beer bottles in the face than the Blues Brothers performing R&B in a country venue. Times have changed, and it’s clear, as the review notes, that we can’t expect them to sound like D.O.A. or Minor Threat, even though we nostalgic ones cling to tracks like "Crooked Head" ;-) For me, it’s already enough that a new band makes me want to mosh again.

trout...I should first learn Ave Maria and Padre Nostro....

Allow me to reiterate that I disagree with you. If the playful aspect were to fade away, I wouldn’t know what to do with Debaser; I would propose myself on other "more serious" sites. The identification of the reviewer does not happen through the name, as has been demonstrated multiple times by people "in sync" with me, such as oleeinar, azzo, psycho, or claisdead, who "unmasked" me with the first comment. Besides, I comment and engage under the name of supersoul, and there’s truly no trick or deception intended. If I send a review under another nickname, it’s purely for fun, just as I hope other Debaser users are driven by enjoyment. Right now, there’s a review in hp by nettadebaser, and at least seven out of eight who commented know who nettadebaser is. It’s unnecessary to say that these are seven people with whom I feel there is a musical and behavioral connection.

blessed are you lewis ... I'm stuck at Radio Birdman ... for the next one expect the New Christs so my official counter reaches 120 :-)))

...after all, that KURT R.I.P YA written on the wall of the latrine in the Live MTV video clarifies everything even more...

And you know what's strange, psycho? I think you're going to like the album... The power of the mainstream ;-)

Because for me, posting reviews with a nickname is a game. Fortunately, this isn't about submitting homework to the teacher in class or filing tax returns with the tax office. For me, it’s about wanting to communicate something, not about receiving a grade, and the value of what’s being communicated is independent (in my opinion) of whether it’s signed by supersoul or nettadebaser or soloperadulti. That said, I respect the opinion of those who associate the reviewed item with ONE reviewer. But for me, if imasoulman (to name a new reviewer to whom I would assign a 5 for every piece) were to be someone else (how ridiculous is this expression in this context), like lewistollani, oleeinar, bubi, or donjunio, it wouldn’t change anything about my experience or the subsequent assessment of the review.