MuffinMan Banned

Mr. Shit, you've lost a piece, so...

Jim, sorry, but can it get any more ironic than this!?

Do your parents also have normal children?

Coming from you, it's a compliment since you know 3 words.

human case PAOLE' the only thing you know about rugby is the oval ball that you often stick up your ass

thank you TEACHER WITH A VIBRATING ASS I'm in a hurry so I'm writing quickly, I just want to point out that everything you write may be correct Italian but you say bullshit without borders... the SUBJECTS you dumbass the SUBJECTS repeat themselves through the centuries ASS OF A COW

Thank you Larrok, at least someone understands me, I hope I won’t have to repeat myself.

Paolé, how did you manage to mess up your brain like that?

ALGOL, don't waste your time with paolé, who is a woman (but better to say hybrid) and doesn't understand a thing (even though she talks about it all the time).

Sure, here’s the translation:
of course, you showed up, not understanding anything about cinema, and for YOU, who don’t understand a damn thing, it’s all derivative. I’ll repeat, fine, you’re right about your opinions, okay! Setting aside the fact that there are also remakes of films that are original in themselves, just as there are films with original stories that are not original at all from a cinematographic point of view (ah this unknown!)... you see, you who understand nothing at all, you keep talking about beautiful or ugly, which has nothing to do with it (or are you perhaps the alter ego of “caz”?)... you understand so little that if it’s true that a MASTERPIECE (since we’re talking about Italian, do you know what that means? or why it is defined as such?) is because it’s extremely original, if a SUBJECT isn’t original, that doesn’t mean the film can’t be, you cow head... PERHAPS YOU HAVEN’T UNDERSTOOD THAT A FILM (OR A WORK) DOESN’T MATTER WHAT THE SUBJECT IS (GIVEN THAT MOST SUBJECTS ARE THE SAME FOR CENTURIES) BUT HOW IT’S PUT INTO PRACTICE.