MuffinMan Banned

climbing on mirrors???? alright... if I don't like either Queen or Genesis, why should I say they're worth 5 just because you say so? and let's face it, this is coming from someone who gives a 4 to a pezzente, oh sorry, pezzali, what credibility does your rating have? it's like saying Harmony books are 4 stars but Dostoevsky is 5, I would probably be quite confused in such a case regarding literature, you clearly are in music...

I read the email and replied to you, thanks for the advice!

"Well, I’ll start saying 'I think it’s true that this movie sucks' about all the ones I see that don’t seem good to me, for trivial reasons among other things. I hope I’m in a free country and that you can also express your opinion about a movie, which might seem good or bad to you. Before going to the cinema (unless you’re a millionaire), you will make choices before entering a theater, or do you see every movie? And if you do make a choice, how do you do it? I imagine you say, 'this looks good, this one doesn’t,' and then you could be wrong. And I repeat, I haven’t judged the film and I won’t hesitate to give it a good rating if it deserves it... you don’t even know what music is if you give 4 stars to the down."

Good job, PVC! I will look for the disc in question.

PIBROCH because it is an art of entertainment, where is it written?

PIBROCH because it is an art of entertainment, where is it written?

Adrian, can you read or do you know the meaning of words????? "mi sa" doesn't mean IT IS SO as the reviewer wrote, but that since I have my doubts about this film, I supported the review, so much so that I didn't give a rating to the film and when I watch it, I will be happy if the film deserves to come here and get 5 stars... go back to listening to Max first, but review your Italian, or maybe that's why you like Max's (horrifying) lyrics; I won't even talk about the music and I couldn't care less about the coherence!

These groups are just too funny; if the cover is better than the music inside, why buy the CD? I'll just print the image on A4!

the reviewer is trash but the album is not!

The difference is substantial between the early '70s and the early '80s... first of all, just having seen the film is enough to understand that it's a post-Taxi Driver movie!!! Secondly, unlike you, I’ve seen it at least 10 times and I don’t need to look it up on Google (stop copying phrases that others say in other posts, by the way referring to other things, and that at least make sense! unlike you)... Thirdly, for the umpteenth time, you contradict yourself; first, you say that the editing was conceived by Scorsese, which is true since he thought of the wonderful sequences of the encounters, then you mention the directing Oscar, which is something else. He probably deserved the Oscar for that too (but since the Oscars are political/promotional awards, I don't give them too much weight) but if directing is a separate award, it evidently differs from editing otherwise it would be called directing-editing... Then, that giants like Scorsese pay utmost attention and above all ideas to editing is what differentiates a good director from a great one (as I've said countless times but you don't understand)... Fourth, "what does the director do in a film? directing! So to say that the directing (the director's work) is less important than the director in a film is a meaningless statement." I know it's hard for you to get there... I said that THE DIFFERENCE is made by the director, that is the one who doesn't just limit himself to filming the shots (but like Scorsese) follows the film and puts ideas into editing, screenplay, etc... Fifth, you must be right given your continuous contradictions and you don't even understand what someone writes.