manliuzzo

Hey, progster, on the 16th, there’s a free concert by Le Orme in Belvedere Spinello (Kr)!!!!! I'm useless at organizing a demeeting, just saying. Here’s a link to a site with the information: Concerti di
P.S. Great review, you mentioned E.L.P., it must have been a nice concert. But were there no keyboards?

And one thing: david81, although he is 11 years older than me, is still a newbie on this site, so he doesn’t yet know the mechanisms of the dark cave that is Debaser.

Hi Ole, you're right, but when it gets like this, my mouse itches too... but I try to hold back :-) Anyway, I haven't disappeared; we just haven't crossed paths...

Now I will express my opinion on the so-called "duplicates": for me, as long as the existing reviews are 1, 2, or even 3, it’s fine, but when it gets excessive, it’s a bit annoying. At that point, it's irresistible, for both the frustrated and the not frustrated, to open the page, read the review, take stock, and conclude that the review doesn’t add anything (almost always). It’s also true that many ultra-duplicate reviews are not rated as 1, but it’s also true that by endlessly reviewing an album, one ends up seeming trivial and making an artist appear unlikable. Of course, if for a user it’s a physiological need to review an album, then the review is welcome; we don’t want to harm anyone, but it’s better not to overdo it. As for the frustrated, unfortunately, there are many on this site, and they’re ready to attack for much, much less. I don’t know the album, the Pink Floyd, you know, don’t drive me crazy, but I do know the suite (not bad). I haven’t read the whole review, but I won’t vote for it.

Isn't AOR "Album Oriented Rock"? Anyway, it's an ugly definition and it's definitely not a musical genre because it has nothing to do with the type of music...

Disgusting no, but you could have put in more words...

Great review, but I didn’t understand this sentence: "In 'Oceano', as well as in 'Attore di circo' (respectively the third and fifth tracks) the instruments are what they are by definition: 'only' 'instruments', precisely, unconditionally at the service of the voice and the lyrics." I listened to a bit of the first piece: I don't like the voice; it sounds like Cremonini’s. However, the intro is not bad. Best regards!

Gummo, unbelievable! I'm picking my nose too!

Gummo, unbelievable! I'm picking my nose too!

Scoop! New Romantic is, as you guys say, a babbo di minkia, because he writes "qual è" with an apostrophe!!!! Anyway, the reviewer is right: it's frustrating to write a review and see so many idiots shooting blanks without knowing what they're talking about. I've listened to a few of his songs on YouTube (but just him) and I didn't think it was that bad. Sure, he's not a genius, but he's decent. Good review.