fenni

I wanted to say to 16-year-olds...the fervor of the comment

I am sincerely moved. The album is a gem. In my opinion, it's undervalued. Do you want to leave? Are you crazy!!! We need serious people on this site to avoid getting eaten alive by 16-year-olds who write more to see their nickname on a webpage than for the opinions they express. And I don't care if it's a duplicate! It's passionate and stunning!!! Thank you!!!
As a side note, I would add that, for example, I seem to remember there are 4 reviews of "The Number Of The Beast." One worse than the other! In this light, duplicates are welcome!!!
See ya! And honestly, hope to see you soon... I really do!

Yes, now I've seen it. Which means that it authorizes me to do it myself in bold... okay. And sorry for my ignorance, dear and very kind psychopomp.

I'm sorry, psychopompe, but I didn't see it. I'm very distracted.

I can't stop listening to it!

but a review?

I quote paloz and I also reiterate the concept. If a review is well written but expresses a different point of view from one's own, it should be voted on solely for how it is written and for the points of reflection it offers, not for the divergence of opinions. Just to be clear: anyone who gives a 1 to a review that would rate a film a 5, to which the commenter would give a 5, is intellectually dishonest and narrow-minded. Always and sincerely debatable fenni.

@eletto1987 I respect your point of view but 1) when I meant poetry, I certainly did not mean the pro-American vein that tarnishes Benigni's film, for which I gave a 5 because, objectively, I liked it and it moved me, perhaps not avoiding the subjectivity of my perspective. 2) As for how to manage comedic situations in such a context, I had indeed mentioned Train de Vie since in that film the grotesque, as it seems to me from your point of view, would not fit at all. Unfortunately, I am honestly lacking in the way I express myself in film discourse and it would probably take several posts to convey what I want to say, but I believe the scenes you mentioned are the most sincere and poetic part of the film, which instead squeezes (and could therefore be accused of a degrading search for emotions) in its way of bringing one to tears and moving in other occasions. And I've always thought that those elements (the unreal situations) are what Benigni wanted the child to see of the reality of the camps, to keep him away, let’s say, from the ugliness that humanity reaches. I know, it may be hypocritical, it may be superficial (since in this light there are films that are much deeper) but in my opinion, those scenes are the most beautiful part of the film and on their own, with the message they convey, are worth the cinematic effort of the Tuscan man so much hated here. For further clarifications, see ya!

obviously

a good key to reading the film. I completely disagree with Benigni's hypocritical view on the theme of the Holocaust, which remains in the background since he has chosen to address something much different. I am ready to discuss it with the author of the review if they can cite at least one film other than Train De Vie and Schindler's List that tackles the theme of deportation and the Nazi camps with such childlike and poetic lightness and delicacy (not in a derogatory sense, of course). It remains true that in some solutions of the screenplay, the pro-American sentiment is often too evident, for historical reasons and otherwise. I hope I have made myself clear. See you soon.