alessioIRIDE

Come on, no way!?! I laughed from start to finish and keep in mind that I'm the kind of person who usually freaks out in the cinema.

blackdog is too advanced

fest you’re right... unfortunately, there’s an idiot like rivoli who renders any possible criticism towards the anonymous useless. I’m not usually one to get involved, but I’m determined to write to the editors to demand his head... he keeps calling people frocio... the problem, which maybe he hasn’t understood, is that frocio is not an insult to me, but I find it offensive to use this word as an insult... then he says nonsense about pasolini and things like that... not even remotely comparable to what is said about the Jews. this is my idea, and it was conceived after being offended by good old arnoldlayne and his numerous fakes: debaser is a kind of risiko. someone comes here with their opinions and you have to immediately try to colonize them, discredit them, occupy them, to extend your domains. if you say to me I like it, someone will come to insult you. if you say I don’t like it, someone will definitely ask you why, and when you respond that you don’t give a damn about music history, there will be a storm. of course, I don’t mean to generalize since I find many users, like fest, pretazzo, peggiopunk, maryg, happypippo, nickgost, flinstone, bjorky, trell, not only competent but also nice... but there are assholes, including myself, who are unbearable. however, one accepts them, accepts cohabitation and moves on, provided it’s a positive coexistence... for example, the coexistence with rivoli is not positive at all. he comes here to spout nonsense on nonsense, and if he's not careful, fascist as he is, someone will entrust him with a humorous news program.

In my opinion, anonymous users can have a place on Debaser, but it raises a question: how many useful comments related to the review are posted by anonymous users? I would say almost none, or at least it has never happened to me... I mean, while reading reviews from 2004, I noticed there were anonymous users who frequented the site, but now, it seems that anonymity is just a temporary fake. Anyway, the beauty of Debaser is that it gives you a voice without lecturing you... of course, decency should be maintained and respected, but I don’t think anyone would be scandalized by a "fuck you," "damn," "shit," "crap"... assuming they are not one of those people who love sipping tea at five in the afternoon. I find it offensive, and fortunately, I can get offended too when I read "faggot," "shit Jew," "the Holocaust was sought after" (this phrase, by the way, is illegal according to what is laid out by our beautiful, brilliant, and wonderfully coherent Minister of Justice). And these phrases are not made up... just look at the reviews of Indiana Jones and those featuring Pasolini, and you'll take a nice trip into a expired brain (Valerio Rivoli). So, if Happy doesn't want to come back, I’m sorry, that’s his choice, but the editors should still readmit him because it’s simply not fair.

I wasn't aware of the possibility of banning for anonymous users... happypippo might let loose, but that's an exception and not a necessity. For me, the more problematic attitude is that of Valerio Rivoli, who mocks everyone, including the dead (how can we forget the comments where he belittled the Holocaust or referred to Spielberg as... shit Jew or things like that). I mean, I can understand the banning of a subject that's not useful to the site, but not that of happy, who, besides being a complete jerk, violent and vulgar (which I like :)), is also an expert in cinema and music. I'm all for the no happy no party committee.

Why ban happypippo and, instead, allow anonymous comments? Frankly, it seems like complete nonsense to me. A façade of false freedom, a senseless TV tower erected. An anonymous commenter insults whoever they want and it's all fine because debaser is a free site... one comments with their own nickname, insults whoever they want and suddenly it's no longer acceptable... is there anyone who has an explanation for this story?

well done

rivulets, but close this toilet... think that you are the least clever one inside debaser, let's say the laughingstock of debaser... the village idiot of the multimedia town.

Why write a pile of bullshit about something that has already been said and done? For fuck's sake, don't you know something that hasn't been reviewed?

And this time I agree with Poletti... beautiful comment by Supersoul. One cannot truly believe to understand anything in Pasolini. Too many keys to interpretation, too many personal beliefs, too much education.