alessioIRIDE

DeRank : 3,14
DeAge™ : 7072 days • Here since 31 january 2007
Martin Scorsese Toro Scatenato
Voto:
I didn't like it very much... I mean, it's undoubtedly a great film, but from the reviews I've heard, I expected better. Anyway, a god of a movie. Maybe there's something wrong with me and Scorsese, because even Taxi Driver, which I like more than this, doesn't make me swoon with pleasure. I'd give this a 3.5 and Taxi Driver a 4... but I round up.
Temple Of The Dog Temple Of The Dog
Voto:
I prefer any fart of Kurt Cobain and any burp of King Buzzo...
Temple Of The Dog Temple Of The Dog
Voto:
I can say that balls.
Emilie Autumn Opheliac
Voto:
beautiful capità... welcome back.
Emilie Autumn Opheliac
Voto:
Is Captainhowdy perhaps cptgaio/emofiliaco? If so: hello handsome.
Paolo Virzì Ovosodo
Voto:
but I am not in favor of a purge. I simply believe that Rivoli deserves to be banned much more than Happypippo.
Paolo Virzì Ovosodo
Voto:
but the problem isn't the words themselves... for you, "cazzo" is unbearable, while for me it's just a filler... the problem lies in the concepts being expressed. I find them unacceptable, and he needs to calm down, not because he calls me "frocio," which, I repeat, isn't an insult to me, but precisely because he expresses concepts that are only condemnable, as they define everything under the banner of a completely personal and offensive paranoia.
Paolo Virzì Ovosodo
Voto:
Wait a minute, being against the policies of the Israeli government and opposing Zionism is one thing, acceptable for me since I think the same way, but spouting bullshit like "it's all in the hands of the Jews" or saying other things that blatantly deny having a certain distrust as a badge of honor is another matter. They are not the same thing just as it’s not nice to use the word "faggot" as an insult... one thing is using it to define people, which is fine... like saying "fatty" or things like that, and another is believing you’re offending someone by calling them a faggot.
Paolo Virzì Ovosodo
Voto:
Don't worry... I mentioned Arnold because he was the first one that came to mind, but there are fakes and fakes, and I have no doubt that someone might also be a mischievous editor. It's likely and even fair. They are people like us; they also go to the bathroom, love to copulate, and pee sitting down. Honestly, I wasn't outraged by Happy's brawls... reading about death threats is strange, but it's not offensive unless for the other competitor... anyway, banned Happy, there are others who fight a plenty (I'm not joking, but I certainly don't reach those levels... oh, if I do, let me know) and who come just to annoy the world.
Paolo Virzì Ovosodo
Voto:
In fact, I don’t justify happy and I don’t want to play devil's advocate. In my opinion, he was wrong because he didn't know how to behave... if you look at the review, the anonymous person attacked me, but since I'm insensitive, he turned to Giovanni. I think he made a mistake, but the staff should first expel Rivoli, that antisemitic bastard, homophobic, fascistoid, and then Happy, since Happy isn't always stupid... in particular moments he loses his mind, but Rivoli is inconceivable... we were actually talking about this yesterday in chat. Then: I'm not in favor of anonymous comments because they often serve, indeed almost always, only to provoke and rarely carry any positive feedback, and then I'm also bothered by the numerous, very numerous fakes of some users... for example, Arnold Layne. Anyway, I gave a face, or rather a nickname, well, I’ve given it for now as I don't seem to have been contradicted.