alessioIRIDE

here, good job olé... let’s get serious. there's this blog, it's not mine, that decided to publish this piece of mine which was rejected and repudiated by almost everyone because it was deemed too explicit, as if I were Pasolini. anyway, the blog is cool and gets some neurons moving (not my piece, but the blog)... link rotto

ahah... indie would be indie, but I wanted to be funny and complicate things... then the mistakes are all poetic licenses made on purpose :) anyway yes blixa, I suck. in fact, I style my hair sitting on the toilet. happy Sunday everyone.

and I explained to you why I am absolutely not an indie group :)

and who publishes for a major label after the first unfortunate album that, after selling just, and I mean just with a smile on my lips, 400,000 copies, received so many kicks in the ass that it risked splitting up; in fact, the split was effective. let's not kid ourselves, the smashing pumpkins were and are a product of the trends of the time, first hard rock, then grunge, then grunge again, then electronic rock, then dark, and now simply rock rubbish. sure: better than many others, but definitely worse than a lot of others.
(all this said without bitterness and just to have a little chat)

but his old band couldn't care less about Corgan. It's just him and Chamberlin (is it spelled like that?) left to spam the mediocrity that’s been crafted for twenty years, getting worse with every new step. then, genres: indie... are you kidding? I'm becoming more and more aligned with Vitalogy, I just fear I might start liking Pearl Jam too :)

mamma mia... I would say it's a bit acidic, have you drank expired milk? I've never been the alternative type and those who know me a little know that. I only perform as myself. Then, Debaser gives me the chance to express my thoughts and I do: that’s it. If you don’t like it, you can easily change the air, maybe write for Ondarock, but I doubt they’ll publish yet another review about Nirvana there. Am I kissing the editors' asses? Come on. Who even knows the editors? The thing is, they actually do something useful and review things that are just a bit more useful than you. You take it out on me, but have you read the comments? They all say pretty much the same thing, so you’d do well to have a little self-reflection and ask yourself: am I useful? Do I review something while saying something good? Am I helping the valid music that has fallen into oblivion? I don’t think so, and I’m sure that if this review had lasted a bit longer on the homepage, someone else would have come along to say it, but my opinion doesn’t matter; yours does. Anyway, I’m not responding to you anymore. You’re petty and lacking arguments, a bit sloppy just like all my peers, and just like them, I won’t talk to you. You call me alternative when I rate things randomly, when I deny any objectivity, when I make no distinction between music. I didn’t say you’re the cause of the editors’ frustration. I mentioned you and others who make your kind of arguments, abusing the freedom Debaser offers us, calling alternative (but to what? Everyone has told you that the review is pointless… I’d be alternative if I liked it) the people who give you a little feedback. Well, you didn’t get the meaning and the signifier. So have fun by yourself and vary your repertoire. Bye.

hahaha... what a beautiful page

Alright, you’re a little touchy… you’ll have your moments once a month, but they will pass… don't worry ;)

I vote for the album based on trust!!! But how can one be so insightful as to love an album before even listening to it?

Damn... I only knew about mould... well, I guess I missed a few issues of novella2000. Captain, the fight is tough, but I'm not afraid :)