alessioIRIDE

DeRank : 3,14
DeAge™ : 7071 days • Here since 31 january 2007
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
I'm sorry for calling you an idiot, but I didn't know what else to call you... sorry! ariciao
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
muffinman bastard if you could read what I write you would understand that I didn't mean to give jazz an intellectual connotation since we all know that the first to play it were black people who were used as rags on the ground, but you and listeners like you, as your comments 56 and 57 clearly demonstrate. That being said, I’m really disconnecting, because sharing is one thing, talking to inhuman cases who can’t even understand that you’re speaking to them is another. Got it: it's not jazz that’s pretentious, but losers like you who make long-winded speeches and share them with the world. Now I hope it’s clearer that I wasn’t targeting jazz (I wash my mouth before talking about what I don’t know), but rather losers like you. tschuss!!!
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
vitalogy forget the papaboy alternative to the alternative of alternative-ism. you don't understand his sarcasm, but he reshapes my comments. whatever... what date are you going? rome? if you're going to rome we’ll meet up. maybe, if he's done with catechism, we’ll also catch one of vic-sanjuro's shows since dinosaurs only make him shit roses and tulips.
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
yeah, June 5th in Rome, Circolo degli Artisti. Who knows what the hell are vic-sanjuro doing?
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
sanjuro, would you like
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
Okay vic-sanjuro, I’m taking note of everything. I imagine you were the pride of the teachers in third grade.
Wooden Shjips Wooden Shjips
Voto:
The review is beautiful. The album has the same cover as Minor Threat (demo tape, to be precise). Who knows if it's a coincidence?
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
Well, I don't understand a damn thing about what I've said. I'll repeat: you are a show-off devoid of any original thought. You read Sartre and post millions of times in that style or one that echoes the style of Nausea. You're just a clever trickster, that's all. I don't dislike you; I just feel a lot of pity for you, like all the other users, for your unfulfilled intentions. You want to be the nice Vic, but Vic has style, you don’t. You’re a poorly made clone. Vic has culture; you steal phrases from various books. In short, you are the Family Day of the alternative to the alternative of the alternativity, and in your intentions and with your catechism-style iconoclasm, you manage to make triceratops heads shit!
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
Sanjuro, you on the other hand are just the fair of quotations. You read a book, it grabs you, and down you go commenting on that book for a month. You get another one: down with stolen quotes. I'll be the family day of the alternative world as you say (I don't even believe there is an alternative world... just think about it) but at least I'm not pretending to be some sort of character or a messiah. It’s clear that it’s not jazz itself that is intellectualized, but the people who try to make sense of that jumble of notes. I’m too young and beautiful (and I say beautiful to quote Bukowski like Sanjuro)... Sanjuro, come on, come to terms with it: Vic has style, you’re a poorly made clone. Super... I don’t like Zappa and I don’t mention him lightly since muffin in an old review on Nirvana started saying go listen to Zappa or something like that. Both Zappa and Nirvana could easily appeal to an individual with a good critical spirit like you, like not me. Tschuss!
Nirvana Incesticide
Voto:
I don’t like Slint, I don’t tear my hair out for Pixies, and Nirvana communicates more or less the same things to me as Husker Du (another band that’s among my favorites). It’s a matter of taste. There’s no right or wrong. What do I care about complex and artificial songs? If I wanted to be a pretentious intellectual, I’d be into jazz and get lost thinking about Frank Zappa. But that’s not what happens.