alessioIRIDE

mmm... after sgarbi I feel a bit out of breath :) however, Berlinguer, throughout his political career, contrary to what he says, was not a consistent person. He didn't change his mind, but he did change his attitude. What comes to mind, as far as I know about his figure, is that "I feel better under NATO's umbrella"... of course, that "my greatest satisfaction is dying without changing my ideas" is very romantic and captivating, but in terms of attitude, he wasn't fully consistent, was he? Regarding consistency, I wasn't thinking in broad terms; I was referring only to myself and my tastes. I find Cèlinè much more fascinating than a pedant like Sartre. Sartre was absolutely consistent and dutiful, adhering to dogmas. Cèlinè, on the other hand, didn’t give a damn about duties, himself, or anything else. :)

I'm for the Biafra syndrome :)

Made by me? I'm not tolerant, Pasolini isn't tolerant. When he talks about tolerance, he addresses a fifteen-year-old boy from Naples... I don't see why I shouldn't talk about it, especially since I feel like I intimately possess something of it. The one who shouldn't speak is you, who comes here to post your emptiness, your ignorance (because we understand that you don't know) regarding Pasolini's thought. So, it would be better for you to remain silent, read the review, take a bath in humility, look for where he pronounced or wrote that phrase, and watch Comizi d'amore. In short, all things you haven't done: WELL DONE. Consistency, Arnold, doesn't belong to me as I change my mind in a whirlwind; I change more ideas than I do underpants, and this is only a virtue since only idiots don't change their opinions. That said, I won't respond anymore because evidently, the discussion transcends to the personal level, and since I don't know you and I couldn't care less about getting to know you, I'll let you go. For me, from what I've understood about you through Debaser, you are like wallpaper. So I won't respond to you either because there would be no exchange with you; I'd just be talking to myself since you come here to post nothingness. Instead, it would have been interesting if you had understood the meaning of the writing and the entire sense of Pasolini's work. Since you understood neither the one nor the other, I hope not to find any more of your emptiness on this page or on any of my other pages (at least in this, I am consistent: I won't touch shit even with a finger). Tschuss!

Yes, but if you think the written text is an anthem of tolerance and Pasolini's phrase is an invitation to tolerance, it means that my "property of language" is a 3, but your understanding of the text is a 0. I recommend, since you refer to it as the pillar of Italian culture (rightly, I would say), to study it seriously and read "Gennariello," or his Emilio. Well, Gennariello was published as an editorial in Corriere della Sera and was not completed due to his assassination. In one of its chapters, Pasolini, master of the imagined Gennariello, begins precisely with this phrase: "Io sono un tollerato," to then compare himself to a "negro." The continuation, of course much more voluminous than what I've quoted here, is the ending of the review, which is NOT an invitation to tolerance, but a simple invitation to mind one's own business in every circumstance. Tolerance, as the word itself indicates, is a form of hypocrisy. A tolerant person understands which side they're on and sees the opposite to tolerate in a purely bullshit Manichean vision. I won't be consistent, fortunately (consistency is one of those things I outright reject), and I don't understand how you can say that since we don't know each other, thank God, at all. Anyway, Arnold, thank you, you made me start a Monday morning in a good mood: a miracle. This stumble of yours, considering Pasolini a tolerant person (I mean, let me understand: what the hell did you see in Pasolini? what the hell did you read? but above all, with what oval did you do it? was it a testicle or the head?) is one of your best (there's plenty to rummage through) on Debaser.

God, so many memories!

Oh my gosh, after Poletti's last comment, I'm seriously considering switching sides and getting Silvio's face tattooed on my right cheek.

beautiful

In my opinion, the jerk is Patton and the three thousand bullshit he publishes fooling you all from head to toe.

Mafioso or not, it would be right for him and the mafia to fuck off. Of course, sideways, everyone is related to everyone, and everyone knows everyone, but a prime minister who knows even the name of just one mafioso should take action to capture that mafioso and not accept a miserable gift that is nothing more than the killing of a poor bastard. In my opinion, you guys are starting to lose it.

this guy is strong. out like a balcony