Hetzer

I, strangely enough, saw it BEFORE Escape from New York.. As a result, I found myself in front of a cheesy film, often shot awkwardly, with digital special effects that were ridiculous even at that time, mostly faded characters but all in all entertaining.. And nothing more. So your review seems exaggerated to me, and it's also not true that Carpenter never disappoints..
Ah, among the flashy action movies of the late '90s, you forgot the memorable "Demolition Man" for me.. Just for this, I could take offense..

A childish and ridiculous review, but I liked the movie. It’s an old-school action-bullshit film, excessive, surreal, never takes itself seriously, and packed with just the right amount of delirious scenes. I like Statham, and he manages to keep the film at a consistently ironic and cocky tone that’s entertaining.

Rax finally returns to old loves, with a track-by-track breakdown divided into paragraphs that is already an eyesore just to look at. The album is pointless, unworthy, a soft piece of crap of no thickness whatsoever. With each album, the U2 claim they will return to their roots; which is ridiculous to even think about. "Walk On" is one of the worst ballads ever written, "Peace On Earth" is utterly terrible, your initial speech about greed and albums from '91 onwards is obscure... Did I already mention that the track-by-track makes your eyes hurt? Good job, keep it up...

Anyway, it's not the first nonexistent album to be reviewed..

My grandfather had it on CD and used to tell me that this record was cut before it was recorded.. Aside from that, you guys need a good deal of pussy..

Tobby is right, that initial "A big part" is delightfully trashy.

I don't know, for me it’s the best Rush album; at least, it’s my favorite. Honestly, I don’t understand how anyone could have doubts about the value of such a record.. And you, good job!

What's this, Christmas is approaching and you're starting with shopping advice? I'm always waiting for you to take the plunge: when will you start reviewing Kyle's videos one by one?

I forgot the vote..

It seems obvious to me that this is just a joke. Moreover, seriously citing Hegel to "explain" the Club Dogo would not only be absurd but also intellectually dishonest. However, even though you write very well, you can't help being excessive, tedious, presumptuous, and heavy-handed (perhaps that was exactly what you intended to be, I couldn't say..), which is everything a provocation shouldn't be. The (major) underlying problem is that you start from the wrong assumptions. These three idiots are artistically null, humanly detestable, and commercially profitable. They are a regurgitation of the market like many others, filled with tired and vulgar slogans, and inscribed, among other things, in the genre that is the epitome of ridiculous and parodic "music." And to understand this, one doesn't need to be a snob, an alternative nerd, or even a socially awkward person obsessed with their cult bands: you simply need to possess a minimum level of common sense, judgment, and objectivity. I'll give you an extra point because you know how to use Italian well.