KimDealISsoHOT

"Anti-American and communist at Kimdeal? ahahahahhahhah, crazy stuff" But in fact, I love America and what it represents as a place; my contempt shifts to other issues that the friendly commentator conveniently overlooks. You see, Kosmo, the problem is that it’s not just Hollywood that is manipulated by the Zionists. In America, there’s a press run by Puritans and Jews; there’s a cinema controlled by the USIA, by information agencies owned by Zionists. We should change the policy of the USIA; in my opinion, it's the only way to change the face of Hollywood. The USIA reviews scripts in advance and can censor them; it examines the dubbing and establishes changes in the images. For example, in films destined for the American market, you won’t see slums, poor neighborhoods, or the shabby areas of the “homeless,” nor any references to the working class or their workplaces.

"Why do they allow these comments that serve no purpose? Only to discredit the site itself." Well, bubi, if you're referring to those unauthenticated insults, I don't think so. I stand for absolute freedom where even those who want to insult while not logged in are completely free to do so; they discredit themselves, and the reviewer is also free to decide whether to accept only authenticated comments or to accept everything. I'm definitely for the second option, and I don't believe it discredits the site. There are authenticated comments these days that are far more disgraceful if you take a look; I'm also talking about other reviews.

I agree with S4doll's comment.

Bubi, why ask Poletti who vic sorriso is?? when you can just ask vic sorriso directly??

I also notice now that you gave a nice 5 to my other review on Tsukamoto. Well, anyway, I hope I have clarified things; your one on this I accept gladly, but I don't see what my comments have to do with it, which are of a completely different nature compared to this pseudo review.

the comment above is obviously for the know-it-all

You can tear my review apart, it's your right, but you didn't respond to my comments, and yet they're there. It's my word against Poletti's, who says that a film like "Il Mostro" is better than the films from the golden era of Benigni. I argue that Benigni's creative crisis has its roots in the post-"Johnny Stecchino" period, and still no reply. Yet, you only need to look at the rubbish he's produced from 1994 to today. Then I argue that Benigni, to survive, came up with this clever trick of making films that allowed him to achieve international success and funding galore to keep producing more nonsense (see "Pinocchio," "La Tigre e la Neve," and the garbage that came out afterwards). Benigni is your unmovable idol, okay, I'm sorry for saying what I and many others think about Benigni post-"Johnny Stecchino," but this is a free site; this is how I feel, and I don't think it's worth spending much time on this director nowadays. Just 16 lines for the review, and you tore it apart, that's fine. I've done other types of reviews in my career as a reviewer here with different usernames, I’ve given my take to every type of work. I approached this one in a laid-back manner (as the film is for me). On the homepage, there's another review of a Japanese film that I decided to write in a different tone, okay? And anyway, I’ll comment as much as I want.

I think you didn't understand, those amateurish comments refer to certain commentators from filmtv that you were discussing... read it again.

always better those amateur and dilettante comments than being a servant of mereghetti poletti

Damn, happy and more crap my movie review? What an insult, but seeing that nice 2 given to the film by someone who understands is quite satisfying.