Bonny91

I am against adoptions simply because a child is born from a man and a woman, and they should grow up with them. Surely, two gay people could give them as much love as any other couple.

I hadn't realized that suddenly the CEI had become favorable to the Dico, although without adoptions! How distracted I am! Thank goodness you're here... Come on, don't say nonsense... Hal is right about adoptions; in Italy, it’s not even discussed... Bindi essentially said: "Dico yes, adoptions no way..."

I am a fellow citizen of Max Pezzali! By the way, the nice Max often goes to eat at a restaurant owned by a friend of mine... Well, I listened to the best of 883 when I was very young, a record I don’t know if I could... Anyway, I don’t vote because I can’t find a balance between the great emotional value and the very poor musical value... How to say, in my heart, but far from my ears!

the use of commas in the second paragraph is terrifying.. the rest is good, good feedback..

Anyway, let's talk about your predictions for future society. So, I am very much in favor of civil unions or an equivalent for registered partnerships, whether they are heterosexual or homosexual. I am also against adoption for homosexuals, as it seems evident to me that a child should grow up in the situation in which they were conceived, that is, for obvious reasons, in a heterosexual "family." Having clarified this point, however, I find the other debates on the supposed dismantling of the "traditional" family (this sacred and mysterious idea) to be unjust, freedom-restricting, and completely out of place. Two heterosexuals who do not want to marry with all the bells and whistles have the right to enjoy a series of material rights in economic and pension matters, etc. The same goes for two people of the same sex who love each other. This is not about paraphrasing gay marriages by replicating traditional weddings; it’s simply about legally recognizing a couple and granting them the right to pension inheritance, or to maintain a lease in the event of one partner's death, or something else. This regards civil unions. Once again, I do not understand and cannot tolerate the ferocity with which the church and some parts of society reject, accuse, and torment people who deserve respect just like everyone else, beyond some choices determined by a particular "nature." That's how it is; I do not understand why we cannot have a bit of tolerance. If there were this tolerance, we wouldn't reach cases like that of the boy from Turin and many others. Stronko, I recommend you watch—or rewatch—"Brokeback Mountain," and then tell me, do you notice any difference between the feelings that the two protagonists have for each other and what you feel for your wife?

punisher/stronko I gave it a 1 because I simply do not agree with the review. The form is excellent, but beyond that, what matters most is the "message" of the author of the text, and since I do not share his positions, I give the vote that I think is appropriate.

in the name of the father and the son... congratulations stronzo, excellent inquisitorial reflections! the part analyzing the film isn’t bad, but did you take inspiration for your reflections from some column on Radio Maria? the style is the same... anyway, if someone has certain instincts, what bothers you about that? they’re not trying to corrupt your child, to make him "perverse" like them, they just do whatever the hell they want... I don't think this creates problems for you and all the integralist Catholics... fine, against nature (your repressive, obscurantist nature that is totally closed to any different point of view), but those perverts aren’t the babysitters of your child, they are people and do what they want with their lives, with their bodies... I repeat, do the people who don’t limit themselves to marital sex create personal problems for you? do they infringe on any of your rights? do they prevent you from doing something or on the contrary want to push you to do something? no. and so you (and everyone else) say nothing to "them"..."them," people you could have a coffee with, chat with, go to the movies with, only that in their alcoves they prefer to dedicate themselves to something different from the missionary position with their spouse... it’s their business, I would say... I, straight, go with my girl, I do everything and enjoy, they with their types, with their whips, with whatever they want enjoy... amen.

because you’re pathetic, Ronnie... the site refuses to help you with your average... 1.80 is too much... god, what a pathetic review! Do you want to be funny? You’re just sad, period. Go read a review of Maledettaprimavera to learn what humor is, loser... christ, what a nerve, and on top of that this fucking review is about a fucking record... just fuck off, listen to real music, maybe you’ll improve and grow a bit... class of ’92, cursed race (with the exception of the ever-smart pep92, but only him!)...

Go Manchester! I'll comment on the match tomorrow if not I'm too sleepy now and then I won't have much to say...

Woodstock, don’t be too much of a pain in the ass… just a bit of goodwill… he’s young, educated, and he will improve (hopefully)… a bit of patience…