Bubi

Very well described film.

I have many Cocker, but I've never even heard of this one.

An album that has a certain solemnity to it has brought to my mind many musicians, from Bromberg to Dave Alvin, but above all the aforementioned Lanegan. The tracks are all of good quality, a solid 4.

I couldn't even find them on YouTube.

I don't know them; if I need to look up something in the encyclopedia, I'll get in touch with a message.

But have you read my comments? For starters, I didn't give them 5 stars, and I wrote that they do good hardcore, but I also prefer Gun Club, Husker Du, or Radio Birdman. I could add Minor Threat, Social Distortion, Avengers, Germs, Clash, Bad Brains, Bad Religion, just to name a few. Since I listen to all musical genres, I'd be in trouble if I first had to research the loyalty and honesty of every artist I put on the table. These "The Virus," in my opinion, do punk that is certainly not inferior to Damned, UK Subs, Agnostic Front, Cockney Rejects, Crass, Pennywise, etc. How do you know if they are consistent or not? Do you know them? As I have already written, being punk is an inner matter, the attitude one has towards society and life in general, a way of being irreverent and nihilistic towards others and oneself. Perhaps you think that today there are no young people who feel these impulses, these motivations? I've answered you, but don't hope to drag me into an endless argument; I've already expressed my views in the other comments.

I don't like DeBaserian arguments either, and it seems to me that there haven't been any on this page. Just friendly exchanges of opinions.

I listen and then decide if I like them or not. I’m not interested in how they dress or if they are trust fund kids. In the other comment, I just wanted to say that there were also "fake" punks back in '77. Badly Drawn Boy has a bit of a hippie vibe, a bit out of time, but he also knows how to make good music. If someone is just a clone of someone else, I let it go.

Do you believe that, for example, the Sex Pistols emerged from the sewers of London and started playing, inventing Punk and becoming its most important icon? Yes, they were the most important group, but only because they spread punk on a global scale. Musically, they were of little worth, and they too relied on "tricks," true "freak show phenomena" led by manager Malcolm McLaren, who had a shop where he sold all the accessories to dress like a "real" punk. And they certainly weren’t the only ones. Being Punk is not an aesthetic matter, but the attitude one has towards society and life in general, an irreverent and nihilistic way of relating to others and to oneself.

Moreover, they are also very inexpensive.