47

Maybe this isn't even the best, but in the trilogy I think they are all worth a 5. Darkness is hair-raising.

More than complaints, there's that eternal life (I believe) which is a rare piece of ugliness, complete with nu-metal bass. It has nothing to do with the album, either.

Seen in 3D, which worsened the state of confusion I was in due to quite a bit of sleep deprivation. Moreover, I was in the last row, and the last speakers were next to the third-to-last one. It must be said that 3D is the mirror of the technological sensationalism that accompanies every new milestone related to "traditional" forms of consumption (I hate touchscreens, by the way); it adds nothing but a bit of confusion. The film isn't bad. A mega Disney animated feature with a technological twist, where the "spiritualist" messages are barely explored, almost to avoid bothering those who are looking for mere entertainment. I'm okay with that. Daft Punk, on the other hand, has always made me sick.

I really didn't understand the opening. That said, the film is aesthetically quite questionable, in my opinion. As for the plot and various twists, I can only say that if it was adapted from a book, I'm not really sorry to have missed it. The review without the introduction could be the description behind the DVD cover, sorry.

this is the most representative album of the Beatles, easy to criticize precisely because, as you say (and you say it well), it "cementifies" their compositional approach once and for all. however, I find this to be a rather sterile discussion, given that even during the period when they absorbed the most disparate influences, they always referred back to the foundation, to the fundamental structure of the "traditional" song form. psychedelia, blues, etc. have always been something with which they dressed what they composed, rather than something that radically changed the features of their musical aesthetic. and that’s why, in my opinion, with Abbey Road it is possible to use the terms mannerism and completeness to define the exact same thing. the melodies and arrangements, the vocal lines, are among the best they’ve ever produced. it’s a rather elegant and cohesive album, so much so that the discussion about the famous songs on the album is somewhat beside the point; the same discussion could be made regarding the "famous tracks" on Exile on Main Street.. best regards.

glorious infogrames (v rally!) and even more glorious psygnosis. who knows what happened to them, what a shame.

great review, I can only go look for it right away!

I’ve finished gentlemen and they’ve just passed me the others as well, including this one. I’ll say something trivial: our afterhours owe them more than just a beer.

Every other line is a nice review. The album is my favorite from Loureedo, it sounds more New York than the entire discography of the Giovini Sonici :)

I haven't read the whole discussion above, but this guy is to music what Fabio Volo is to literature. What’s wrong is exactly the way he presents himself. Fraud.