47

DeRank : 1,78
DeAge™ : 7150 days • Here since 12 november 2006
Ozzy Osbourne Bark at the Moon
Voto:
the title track is super cool and a lot of fun. ozzy's "evil" laugh drives me crazy
Tricarico Giglio
Voto:
ghemison, the Baustelle went to Sanremo.. :)
I like this, I’m putting it in download.
Alice In Chains Facelift
Voto:
the album is the least beautiful of their production, but "love,hate,love" is stunning...
Iron Maiden Live After Death, Special Edition 2008
Voto:
In fact, I don't consider everything I don't like to be crap, and whether you believe it or not, I've listened to all the Maiden albums. I don't even hate marketing, which is part of our society; (if anything, I can criticize those who base their success solely on marketing, but that's not the case with Maiden) and it has undeniably expanded the audience for this band. It wasn’t a judgment; it was an observation. I was only referring to the fact that what Rivoli said about Maiden is true, but it applies to a thousand other bands, regardless of whether I like them or not. Now I'm saying it: Maiden aren't crap, I don't like them and I find them overrated; for me, they could have ended their career with five good albums and that would be enough. But just as my opinion is subjective, so is yours. And anyway, you said it yourself, you reviewed the "surround" of the reissue of the album; about the album itself, to avoid boring us "haters," you didn't talk, so you wrote a page illustrating only the additions to the original version. (And by the way, I gave you a 4 because you did it well; I was just wondering if it was really necessary.) Anyway, I apologize for bothering you with every review you make about them. ;-)
Radiohead In Rainbows
Voto:
it's not true easy, I started to like Tom Yorke's voice after hearing this..
Iron Maiden Live After Death, Special Edition 2008
Voto:
I expressed myself poorly; I thought your review of the album itself was questionable because you mainly reviewed the extras (which is a bit like reviewing the packaging...) and it's an album that's been reviewed multiple times. This is all without any intent to create controversy; I just threw it out there. After all, I care about everyone. Rivoli is right in saying that certain people, with marketing strategies, tend to direct their "commercial appeals" towards certain user demographics: it's obvious that everyone, or almost everyone, wants to sell, and I certainly don’t hold that against the Maïden. I just wanted to clarify todos aquí. Best regards.
Iron Maiden Somewhere In Time
Voto:
I quote pretazzo
Meshuggah ObZen
Voto:
I was getting ready to listen to it; I downloaded the album nearly a month ago and hadn’t listened to it at all for a while. Speaking of the album, it’s both amazing and a total disappointment at the same time; it's true, the recording is terrible and pretentious, the voice is monotone and disinterested (there’s not a single lyric that comes to mind after weeks of listening, at this point an instrumental album would have been better) and generally the coordinates are those of nothing, with less experimentation, because obviously the style is now consolidated, but with a bit more "lightness." Basically, the album is inoffensive, it doesn’t surprise you and doesn’t smash your brain like the others do, but after a few more listens, the little details emerge. The bass in electric red, the crescendos in bleed, the perfect constructions of the final tracks. And the implosive energy of the title track, with the guitar sounding like a pneumatic hammer... in short, zero innovation, a lot of mannerism, but there’s definitely quality and inspiration. If it had been released instead of nothing, we’d be talking about a masterpiece, so if we remove the release date from the judgment of the album (the album itself is always the same), we can easily silence the meshuggah alarm bell. However, the cover art is objectively terrible...
The Beatles + AA.VV. Across the Universe - Soundtrack (Deluxe edition 2 cd set)
Voto:
I really didn't like the covers.. not even one.