uxo

DeRank : 0,78
DeAge™ : 7158 days • Here since 3 november 2006
John Scofield & Pat Metheny I Can See Your House From Here
Voto:
A fucking delirium we could have easily done without.
Pat Metheny The First Circle
Voto:
It's hard to find anything more pointless to read. This text is disrespectful in every way. Forgetting the typos (porcatro, reread), using the same adjective three times not only drains it of any meaning—if it even has any left—but it neither educates nor informs. If you really have to "review," maybe put a bit more effort into it. Or just write in your stupid little notebook, but don't waste our time with this garbage.
Brady Corbet The Brutalist
Voto:
Yes, but what a load of crap, the usual appeal to the Jewish drama, enough already; furthermore, we are faced with a historical falsehood, all in the name of a dramatization that distracts from the architectural focus. Is this good? Yes, because the hyperdramatic narrative (yes, hyper) avoids the documentary genre, and that's fine, but in the end, with drugs, disabilities, rape, loneliness, addiction, social rejection, and so on, it goes completely off the rails.
Sean Baker Anora
Voto:
I don’t usually need to look for comedies; I usually go to adult sites where I search, among others, for the categories "stepmom," "roommate," or "intruder," but for this one, I had to make an exception because the protagonist embodies the girl-next-door, she’s real in all her powerful and disarming femininity. In short, it was impossible not to give my little friend a squeeze thinking of her. As for the movie, I have to say it reminded me a bit of Woody Allen’s style during the period of Annie Hall, but angrier and more restless, still grotesque, a crazy kind of romance. I mean, I missed a film as wild and equally quirky as this one. Aside from some annoying clichés (like the rich kid being a drug and alcohol consumer), I would say I had fun.
Martin Scorsese The Killers of The Flower Moon
Voto:
In my opinion, the final radio gimmick is brilliant and historicizes the film.
Michael Haneke Happy End
Voto:
Good job, but I struggled to reach the points that interested me. Now I'm not exactly sure what to expect (when I watch the movie, which has been on my list for a while), but I'm not as intrigued as I had hoped.
Michael Haneke Amour
Voto:
Interesting what you write; you’ve captured many elements and translated them into description. However, the film, I can’t tell if it’s a virtue or a flaw, doesn’t leave a dramatic aftertaste, because that pathos is consumed and experienced entirely within the narrative, whose ending feels almost natural. The extreme act of love, what else?
Michael Haneke Il Nastro Bianco
Voto:
You really got to the heart of it. In just a few lines, you captured the key elements. Haneke is a sadist in life and in his work.
Michael Haneke La Pianista
Voto:
I read Jelinek's book and, although I have respect for Haneke, I fear that the film adaptation might transfigure the very vivid image of sordid and sorrowful Vienna depicted in the book. I live in Vienna and reserve the right to maintain that image. But guys, the book is incredibly powerful, it really leaves you speechless, it stings with ferocity and despair, it reveals the madness and instability of the protagonist, caught in a kind of self-destructive process, a descent into hell, an erasure. Who knows, maybe the author was processing the parent. I wonder if Haneke picked up on this too.
Roman Polanski Il Coltello Nell'Acqua
Voto:
How I would love, of the aforementioned film, to make a nice blasphemous porn-erotic remake, with the young man getting rid of the old one to take possession of the wife. The screenplay is ready. I am looking for eager directors.