Lord

I had never heard them either.

Rude Title

The Beatles are both a starting and an ending point, as they push you to listen to experimental artists due to their pop infused with various genres and influences. At the same time, however, there’s a need to sift through some of the stuff, and you find yourself listening to the Beatles again. I'm not sure if I conveyed it well: this has happened to me, after a binge of 30-minute suites, I ultimately felt the need to detox with the essence of the Beatles.

I'm a Beatles fan and I'm proud of it!!

"...like atheists who, at the very moment they deny God, are in fact filled by Him and experience His immensity..." but is that phrase yours? Because if it's yours, then I must commend you, cheese... A virtual handshake.

Okay, the Beatles were four, but look at how McCartney has always been the most active, in every sense, the one who cared the most about the Beatles and the most musically talented of the four: I'm not praising him, but in the end, he was the glue of the group. He was the one who experimented the most (musically), the one who was open to the avant-garde (musically, by the way, he was one of the very first to believe in the talent of Pink Floyd, whom he saw in 1966 when they were still living on bread and water). I don't like to think that the Beatles without Paolo DeCarta "would have been a flash-in-the-pan group of the '60s," but perhaps there's a good dose of truth in those words. That said, the facts went as they went, so it seems silly to think about how the Beatles would have been with or without any of their members. In the end, each of them had their moment of genius, and as the Beatles, they wrote their significant chapter in the history of music. One last thing, I've seen the word hypocrisy associated with Paul McCartney in favor of Lennon's genius: to me, Lennon always seemed like a junkie, a madman; McCartney, in his sincerity and honesty, was occasionally arrested for possession of marijuana, but all the joy...

Here, the songs all have that sheen that I don't know...

Not my favorite

The album "I don't know it," I only have the regular White Album, to which I would give a nice 5, even though it's not my favorite by the Beatles (even though it's an album of such high caliber that it outweighs the entire discography of Neu! and some other Kraut-rock bands). Regardless of what anyone says and what Pierino might say, the Beatles of this period are incredibly important and have significantly influenced subsequent generations, not just in the realm of frivolous Brit-pop, practically any band has been influenced by them blah blah blah... Not understanding this means having entire mortadellas on your eyes. But let's be clear, it wasn't just the Beatles, it's important to say that. There were also the Queen, ha ha ha ha ha...

Wow, how ugly they were. I don’t know them except for that album from 1974 with which you started this endless series of reviews. Kudos for your dedication!