eclipse

It certainly takes courage, doesn't it? Approaching this work is not simple at all! The idea of revisiting the most significant parts of the album is bold; only with the same words of the Floyd can The Wall be explained! Aware of their greatness, they conceived it! Great, Charles...

...anyway, I didn't mean to say Liam's voice was a copy, but the way of singing; I meant the posture, the moves on stage...that's all! I didn't think such a statement would cause such an uproar! and anyway "...Echo And The Bunnymen, Morrissey and Weller... with a little phrase thrown in there :-/) well....."...it’s not like I could talk in detail about all 34 performances; the poor little ones would have killed themselves reading it. And sorry, I thought I'd talk about bands that impressed me and I like much more than Echo, etc.; I like Morrissey and Weller and I mentioned them. bye!

Don't even get me started! I know I should have waited, but I was too inspired! Come on, it couldn't not be there... anyway, luckily no one is watching it! :))

what crap you are, charles!!! :)
I know dots... that you said the same thing, I just liked it and wanted to write it too! :)

Gentlemen, and especially dots...etc! Let’s not bask in who invented what... Rock wouldn’t be what it is today, for better or for worse, without the contribution of all the historic bands (think Who, The Clash, Cream, Pink Floyd, Beatles, Elvis..). In short, everyone has contributed in a fundamental and unique way, giving rock that vastness of unimaginable genres! It cannot be denied, of course, that the Floyd, together with the Beatles, gave life to Psychedelia, or were anyway the major representatives. If we want, we can attribute the paternity of this to Barrett, or to Waters if you prefer, or even to the poetic nature of Gilmour's guitar, or Mason's drums, or Wright's keyboards—what would Pink Floyd be without them?
The point is, they are all too important! Indistinctly! They are the example of what is defined as a true band! No one could be left out!
So, in my opinion, it’s wrong to fight to prove the merits of someone who surely no one doubts, it’s just impossible to say who is more important than someone else... or is it?
:)

Guys, I see that you've become more passionate than ever. Anyway, I’d say it’s fine that tastes are tastes, but to compare the Floyd, the band that defined rock, with groups that, no matter how great, will never reach their level... well, that seems quite reductive to me! Don't you think?
Ah, Airone, regarding the content, you’re right, it’s explicitly political. Sorry about that, I forgot to correct that sentence; it’s my first review... :)
Anyway, it’s true that the album reveals all the suffering of the Floyd at that moment!

well...Pausini...speechless!

Okay, it’s true that we don’t expect a masterpiece from Lavigne, but to give it a 3/5 and dismiss an album that I personally find beautiful, and that is in no way a continuation of The Wall, seems excessive. Anyway, it’s your opinion, and I respect it!

I don't know the album, so I won't vote for it, but if you give it a 1, it means it’s really worthless! But was this the review that Charles checked or the one that still needs to be published? :)))

probably hal! it's been a while since I've listened to it!!