c'è Banned

The ranking of users depends on how many love you, who loves you, how long you've been a member, how many times you've offended ArnoldLayne and Blackdog, and so on. Obviously being loved by Iside is different from being loved by DaveJonGilmour, not just in numerical terms. It's kind of a reputation; if it's negative, it means your opinion is worth less than zero. In reality, the precise mechanisms of the ranking are unknown, bordering on the esoteric with ten digits after the decimal point, making it quite difficult to understand, because when you start to grasp the mechanisms on debaser, what happened with sciusciola these days occurs. Anyway, with this post, I absolutely didn't want to shift the focus from the fact that canedog is the Berlusconi of debaser.

@Opel: comment 147 is fantastic, but it can't reach the levels of 70. @G.G.: the Stratocaster is always the Stratocaster, there isn’t a chez to do. @sciusciola: it seems clear to me that the DeRango for reviews (and to achieve that, the derango for users) was born precisely from the consideration that anyone can go, as unfortunately you did, and place a 1 on the most liked reviews, which would have only needed a 4, and not a 1, to lose hundreds of positions. Your 1, on one hand, inevitably lowers the average, while on the other hand, raises the derango of the review, because your personal derango is negative. In short, the DeRango is the most reliable ranking along with the favorites one, as it can’t be tampered with by any user (and I believe that’s also the reason you were unbanned). When Turkish explained the mechanism to us before it was implemented, we were quite skeptical, but having seen it applied, I’ve changed my mind. P.S. it's a good sign if users almost never agree with what I say. Not all of us are in a frantic and anxious search for consensus like CaneDog, who compares everyone to Bondi, Gasparri, Capezzone, without realizing (sadly) that he is the current Berlusconi, trying to make people laugh with stupid jokes, aware that 95% of users (or voters) enjoy sex and insults, especially if vulgar.

On the issue of votes, we descend to the brink of ridiculousness; characters like sciusciola have always existed. Moreover, when a user was doing the same job in my reviews, you seemed quite pleased, and you even took his side. Yet now you come to plant all this whining, complete with requests for bans; you really are a case for psychologists to study. Let's just say that as of now, blackdog 1 : cptgaio 7, a bit like the unforgettable Roma - Manchester United.

Judging by the petty insults and the irritable and nervous responses, it seems that many users have really hit the nail on the head. Rereading comment number 285 of the review "La Ricerca della felicità" in light of the little altars and the revelations à la biùtiful of this beautiful page makes everything much clearer. You are a user desperately seeking approval and to be liked, employing methods of captaio benevolentiae that border on pathetic, like the clumsy imitation of wreckers and various references to politicians on duty (see Bondi, Gasparri, etc. – true demagogy and populism of the lowest level, almost relegation zone, that of Roma just to clarify). What makes me laugh the most (besides post 70, which is truly the pinnacle of this page) is the fact that you reproach me for being quarrelsome with other users: don’t you get that not everyone is obsessed with votes and with appearing cool and likable at all costs? You are all facade; your comments are written by a dyslexic just to make people laugh (at least in your intentions), while the reviews aim for votes and averages; not to mention the network of emails, private messages, and everything you say and do behind people's backs (on a site that talks about music, think about how sad that is). You’re pitiful, almost deserving of pity. Besides quoting most of cpgtiao's posts, which it seems has already buried you without ever using insults, silly remarks, or jokes (and here you've doubly made a fool of yourself), I just wanted to add that there’s no need to summon Del Piero, because for you, Clugji Cluijy is more than enough, I really don’t know how it’s spelled.

Sure, with all the fake stuff, private messages, secret lists, ban requests, bans, unbans, untouchables, and Buffon, you beautiful people don’t stand a chance. I hope I'm on the dog’s list of untouchables too, remembering a 3 to Elvis for which he cried mucho et per molte weeks. For Diana.

No, instead it’s a problem, because besides not being found in the de-motor, it can’t be added to favorites, or rather, it can be added but it doesn’t show up. In addition, it enjoys much less visibility compared to the 46 reviews of Death Magnetic.

Of course, since metallarobionico is no longer around, the site is starting to fold in on itself. Leave the dog alone, it's all the fault of the cold; right now it's at -16, beyond any rosy prediction. With a bit of luck, tonight it might sleep at -13. In the meantime, it seems sciusciola has been banned.

The Maiden evoke some sounds of Thin Lizzy; I'm reminded of "Emerald" from Jailbreak in 1976, which, aside from the vocals, sounds like a track from the debut Iron Maiden album, in line with songs like "Phantom Of The Opera." However, to say that without them Maiden and Priest wouldn't have existed is quite a stretch.

Okay, that's enough. I've notified the postal police.

beautiful