c'è Banned

But you really like me, huh Gustavo? But do you know that they say that fakes are born to try out personalities they don’t have the courage to show in real life? But then, let me ask you something out of curiosity, when someone speaks to you (I mean the fake, not your original alter ego), do you feel satisfaction? Do you feel fulfilled when someone allows you to express your sexuality? It would be interesting to have a discussion set up like that, you know.

but why does someone force you to write them? I hope not, come on, it would be too cruel a world

I got it right, didn't I?

They say there's no deaf man like one who doesn't want to hear. In fact, now that I think about it, you're right to review the Genesis of the pop era, stuff that’s as stale as the reviews themselves. PS the comments have nothing to do with it, "Appetite For Destruction" is around 140 and I believe it’s the tenth one or so, and I swear nothing, absolutely nothing has been said that hasn’t already been said. Really, nothing at all. Just one curiosity, what album will the review coming out in a few days be about? "We Can Dance"? "Duke"?

"Evidently, Genesis in Italy provoke passions and debates": absolutely not, I believe everyone is of the opinion that this album literally sucks javelins.

Then, paolo1968, it’s not that we two can’t stand the fact that you write about Genesis; I mean, don’t take it as a personal attack. I believe I can once again speak for OleEinar when I say: “you know we don’t care about that, right?” If you really want to write and comment only on Genesis, at least make an effort to review something of theirs that hasn’t already been reviewed. Too much effort? Then we can move on to choosing the most stupidly sublime suite or the most onomatopoetic cover as (the great) Luca Laurenti said.

Starblazer, be careful how you speak; it's called qualified and aggravated counterfeiting, meaning an unauthorized reproduction of someone else's work with an appropriation of authorship.

Would you really want to find yourself one day, on your deathbed, looking at your personal page and seeing the message: "Did you know you're using xxxxxxxxxxx bytes on the DeServer disk?" and being eaten alive by remorse knowing that you haven't published anything unreviewed?

Dear paolo1968, you see, the problem isn't in reviewing this or that band. The problem is that this is the fourth review of "Invisible Touch," the third of "Abacab," and the same for Genesis. I don't think the other users care if someone listens only to the same band all the time. To be honest, I don't even think they care if someone listens to the same album or even the same song repeatedly. The problem lies in the endless alternatives (to things that have already been reviewed multiple times, though). The masochism comes from having read: “Check with the DeMotore di ricerca that the album you want to review is not already present in the magical DeDatabase. If it is, decide for yourself whether it's still worth writing a review: maybe yes (you have something else to say), but maybe also no." and pretending it doesn't matter. The question is: will you review them all? Just to be sure (in the Collinsian way), I wish you a good day, also on behalf of OleEinar.

The nice thing is that Robert Johnson's review has double the views and less than a third of the comments.