c'è Banned

I would have liked to write comments 113 and 114 myself, but then I gave up. Anyway, I’m quoting them.

Furthermore, "La Grange" frighteningly resembles the fantastic "Shake Your Hips" by the Rolling Stones from Exile On Main Street, which was released the year before "Tres Hombres." Let's say the first 20 seconds of "Shake Your Hips" and the first 20 of "La Grange" are a complete photocopy in every way, even the drums.

Did the Drim Tiater manage to ruin this record too? Then they must be contagious :D

I personally go crazy for a track by Canned Heat titled "John Lee Hooker Boogie" from Gamblin' Woman in 1996. In the end, the riff à la "La Grange" by ZZ Top comes straight from "Boogie Chillen" from 1948, the one that the Zep used to medley right after "Whole Lotta Love."

I thought I was the only one who had it :D

In fact, after the incident with the duplicate, I really hope for you that comment 53 was the last response. Not only do you not know the albums you're talking about, but you tell others that they don't understand anything about music. You should be ashamed of this; I wonder if you understood it this time.

So there is a big difference between the album I reviewed, "The King Of The Delta Blues Singers," and "Complete Recordings." There is a difference because it’s the album I reviewed that Keith Richards, Jimmy Page, Clapton, Peter Green, Bob Dylan listened to until it was worn out. The story of the duplicate is really pathetic, just like every time you try to argue.

Duplicate? It doesn’t seem to me that that album has ever been reviewed. And you even gave it 5, but from this statement, you show that you don’t know it. The album that has been reviewed is a compilation released in the '90s. The album I reviewed is the one that Hammond had published, and it’s the one that all the guitarists of the '60s kept and listened to. Again, it’s clear that when you talk about music and don’t offend, you make a poor figure that you couldn’t do worse. Moreover, a duplicate means 2 reviews of the same album, something you’ll explain to me one day. The rating given out of spite only shows that you’re acting like a child; I really don’t give a damn, and besides, you had already commented on it the same day it was published, so don’t come telling me stories. As for the rest, your “oh, you haven’t listened to it” or “you don’t understand a damn thing about music” speaks for itself. Everything you like has to be a masterpiece; otherwise, those who don’t consider it such don’t know a damn thing about music. Well, as soon as Hendrix's rights passed to his estate, it was removed from the catalog and has never been put back. It’s still out of production; Kramer made his money, so you’ll just have to deal with it.

Yes, it means that if you are the age you say you are, you should be ashamed. But since I don't believe you, go back to Pantera, Jamiroquai, and other similar stuff, and avoid provoking me in the comments like you did with Van Halen, which only shows ignorance and a five-year-old's attitude, like throwing a tantrum.

Yes, Iside, one of the 3 million posthumous albums. Just because I adore Hendrix, I give that record a 3. Panthera will have to come to terms with it before becoming an official case study.