Hal

DeRank ™: 9,08

DeAge™ : 8380 days • Here since 6 may 2003

Love Contact

R.E.M. Monster

5 mar 04

Voto:

Read it all, run run ... :)

Derek Sherinian Black Utopia

5 mar 04

Voto:

Sure! Please provide the text you would like me to translate.

Blonde Redhead Misery Is A Butterfly

5 mar 04

Voto:

I don’t mind the spontaneity of the review at all. Cheers donz

David Sylvian Blemish

4 mar 04

Voto:

TOMORROW Spazio Boario in Rome 5/3 €7 the idiot made a mistake :)) on the bright side, I still won’t see them, but at least tomorrow I won’t be in the office ... I hope ...

What a shit day, all of you busy and cheerful. The Einstürzende Neubauten are playing in Rome, a friend calls me before going to the concert just to make me die a little inside while I'm stuck in the office finishing some goddamn report, and I’ll have to have dinner with some stale apricot tarts from Mulino Bianco forgotten in a drawer... and you come talking to me about cookies... why today??? Shit!!! TAKE IT EASY? I can’t do it… Fuck me. The truth? I envy you. Have a good one, I'm going back to that fucking report...

Einstürzende Neubauten Perpetuum Mobile

4 mar 04

Voto:

Soon they will start playing at Spazio Boario in Rome (€7) and I'm still at work, and I don't know when I'll get out of here.... in the background this record... a friend promised me a call from the concert... damn how depressing...

David Sylvian Blemish

4 mar 04

Voto:

Nothing to say about these "comments," nor about sexual tastes. You can pair up even with an empty pumpkin for all I care; in fact, it might suit you. But let me just say that your food choices really leave much to be desired. Step into a pastry shop once in a while, it does wonders for the mood, and maybe you'll save the money you spend on your therapist. (If you didn't get that, which wouldn’t be surprising, you can take these words as a circumlocution replacing a "fuck you" for the dozen emails I've received because of you). Have a nice day.

David Sylvian Blemish

4 mar 04

Voto:

Frantz, without beating around the bush and borrowing an expression from you, I’ll tell you right away that I didn’t understand a damn thing about your comment. I didn’t get where the reviewer’s claim to pass off their review as objective comes from (no irony, I really didn’t see it). But I also don’t understand what an objective review is. You say what it should NOT be, but not what it should be. I have a doubt: does it even exist? I didn't grasp when writing from the heart is a virtue and when it becomes a flaw. The only thing that seems clear to me is that you find the information about the artist excessive and not very clear. But that was already noted previously. As for the rest, I didn’t understand the meaning of your criticisms. You say they are directed at the review, but to me, they seem to target only the reviewer’s intentions. That’s a different matter. Regards.