Well, Poletti, for me The Village is not a great film, not only and not so much for the "plot," but for the predictability and weakness of the narrative structure, also thanks to the way it was shot, the fragility of the acting, the overuse of clichés, and so on. Opinions... I saw it only once at the cinema and I regret the ticket price, what can you do. I understand that it might appeal to some and that someone like you might consider it a good film, but all in all, I hope you agree that there can be room for different opinions. The Sixth Sense, on the other hand, I liked, but without excessive enthusiasm; nice and nothing more, in short.
As for the rest of the discussion (La Mariaeleneide), I’d like to say that, given the tones assumed, it seems a bit exaggerated at times. I’d like to try discussing it differently. I might be wrong, but in my opinion, when you write something in this space, you do it because you want someone to read it. Otherwise, it would be just as well to leave what you write on your own hard drive, safe from prying eyes. So we write to communicate and share ideas, impressions, sensations about a record or a film along with the reasons that led us to love/hate it. If that’s the case (to communicate and share), then the feedback from those who read it can be relevant (assuming good faith), which is something to consider. In this case, dear Maria Elena, it emerges that many (myself included) did not grasp the meaning of your words. It’s legitimate to ask why? I have my own opinion that I’ve thrown into the mix alongside the others. If miscommunication arises, there can be many reasons; one possible reason is that one didn’t explain themselves well. And one can explain themselves well even while being “imprecise.”
Therefore, it's not so much (or only) a matter of precision. In my opinion, you were ineffective in communicating because you didn’t channel your enthusiasm well and carefully, favoring a "spoken" style of writing. Perhaps it would have been enough to read what you wrote several times, maybe out loud, refining the words and phrases, putting yourself in the reader’s shoes. And all this might still not be enough. Keep in mind, indeed, that not being able to communicate your thoughts is not something infrequent; on the contrary. And when it happens, nothing grave or scandalous occurs, but it certainly isn’t advisable to treat your interlocutors as if they were idiots who understand nothing. Of course, criticism may not be pleasant; there have certainly been times when I thought or said, "It’s you who don’t understand," but then, upon reflection, I came to the conclusion that I hadn’t explained myself well. In summary: if the message we wanted to send doesn’t get through, we should also consider the possibility that it may depend on ourselves (the sender). If we understand/accept this, perhaps we’ve taken the first step toward improving our communication. I don’t know if I’ve... made myself clear, I hope so. Bye.