Hal

DeRank ™: 9,08

DeAge™ : 8378 days • Here since 6 may 2003

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

Mauro, you’re amazing; the strength of your arguments convinced me, I was struck, finally I could quench my thirst at the fountain of truth. So, in the next elections, I will vote for Alleanza Nazionale, and tonight I’m going to shave my head bald. After that, I’ll have a barbecue with my history books, since they need to be rewritten by the university of Predappio. I hope you won’t consider these choices too moderate. Bye comrade (yes, yes, you’re just pretending and this is spam).

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

keep insulting, you have nothing else

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

masked?? this is the most beautiful

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

a lobotomy wouldn't be enough, damn... also because what would you take away?

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

the quote from al capone/de niro suits you well, good job :) I bet you're also good at baseball, right?

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

In the meantime, I'm waiting for your answers that are absent (you're teasing us! but you're making me laugh a lot) hey, have you seen this mess?

Green Day American Idiot

16 nov 04

Voto:

Oh, what a drag. The point of the discussion is this. Although I don't agree with it, the war in Belgrade was conceived from a multilateral perspective, which was not the case for the war in Iraq. The theme of multilateralism has been one of the elements (for me) of weakness in Bush's choices. With this, I don't mean to say that Belgrade is better than Baghdad, but that the contexts were different. Because as far as I'm concerned, I was opposed to the intervention in Belgrade just as I was to the one in Iraq. Do you understand now, or should I draw you a picture?