Gustav Mahler Sinfonia n° 5
Voto:
Speaking of the other points that emerged, I wanted to thank those who read and say to Zigghio that I share a positive evaluation of Pierre Boulez's interpretation, but an interpreter I love very much for Mahler is Sir George Solti. What struck me about this particular symphony is how the initial trumpet fanfare is more resounding compared to Abbado’s. I don’t remember having listened to Karajan. @ Josi, this is a gap I envy you; discovering Mahler is a magnificent experience, I would recommend starting with the fourth. @ Enea, the adagietto makes complete sense only in the context of this symphony, so you absolutely must listen to it. I'll leave you with some verses by Rückert since Josi highlighted them: "If you love for beauty, then don't love me / Love the sun that has golden hair! / If you love for youth, then don't love me / Love spring that is young every year! / If you love for treasures, then don't love me / Love the maiden of the sea, who has many clear pearls! / If you love for love, then love me, yes! / Love me always: I will love you always!" Bye :)
Gustav Mahler Sinfonia n° 5
Voto:
But why set limits? In truth, when reviewing Mahler, one could go on even longer. For example, there’s a whole discussion to be had about the methods of construction/evolution of the symphonic form that Mahler took full advantage of with immense orchestras. Then there’s the topic of the references to popular themes. The controversies with other composers of his time. The autobiographical significance of the first symphonic cycle. His peculiar way of juxtaposing themes, the concept of leitmotiv, and so on and so forth. I believe it’s impossible to exhaust all this discourse in a review that must still be readable. But there’s always hope that this happens in the comments section, which should, however, stem from at least a less superficial reading. In fact, at the conclusion of what has been written, it mentions "a profound, cathartic, and overwhelming experience" and it’s even bolded. Best regards.
Atleticodefina Atleticodefina
Voto:
I got the Maganoidi album on your recommendation, if I remember correctly, and I don't regret it – despite your criticisms of my musical tastes, I do follow your suggestions from time to time... me ;))))) . If it’s anything like before, then I'll take this one as well; worst case scenario, there's always the cd crossing ;))
Jan Dismas Zelenka Trio Sonatas
Voto:
A CME day on Debaser!!! I couldn't be happier. So compliments at will also to John for the choice and description :))
Ryuichi Sakamoto Chasm
Voto:
I know, Gabri ... it's the budget's fault :))
Stephan Micus The Garden of Mirrors
Voto:
Other Ways, Other Worlds, Other Possibilities ... beautiful
Tord Gustavsen Changing Places
Voto:
For the series of continuing coincidences... I too have just discovered the music of Ketil Bjornstad; it’s one of those classic listens that never gets old. With the reviews and quotes that have emerged, Gustavsen becomes an even more interesting proposition. Kudos once again to ECM for delivering gems one after another and to the reviewers who present them to us :) (by the way, has anyone heard the album by Manu Katchè, Neighbourhood?)
Chet Baker & Enrico Pieranunzi The Heart Of The Ballad
Voto:
I recently read an interview with Elvis Costello in which he reminisced about his collaboration with Chet Baker. He must have been a charismatic figure from the way Costello spoke of him. A special person. Often - referring to gossip - I find myself thinking that it's a shame many people remember perfectly his arrest for drug charges and not his music. I'm giving the album a chance.
Santana Welcome
Santana Welcome
13 nov 05
Voto:
The closing of the review is beautiful, welcome salmacis.
Ryuichi Sakamoto Chasm
Voto:
Just this morning, I'm listening to another Sakamoto. I borrowed two bizarre yet interesting records, "Alexei And The Spring" and "Derrida." I’ve been told they are soundtracks, but I don’t know much else. So far, it seems the listening experience is worthwhile; sublime and acclaimed are fitting adjectives, in short. As for the CD you're reviewing, I caught it briefly but didn’t pick it up, and I think I may have made a mistake.