gbrunoro

enough...

@Daft
Listening to Ozzy in high school must have shocked you so much that you forgot the most basic grammar rules: "another" is written without an apostrophe... :D

@Stablazer
do you want to understand or not that all the music you talk about would have never seen the light without what Ozzy did with the Sabs? you might like it or not, but the cultural and historical weight of those albums is undeniable. now you have two options: either grow up and learn to live, or stop saying nonsense... in the end, you humiliate yourself and that's it, it's pathetic!

Rivoli is hopeless; it seems like a fact to me: I wonder why someone insists on spouting nonsense, especially about things they detest. You can't get more masochistic than this...
Anyway, let's try to clarify: Ozzy is a media phenomenon that is, in part, independent of music. He is an entertainment character and should be regarded as such. The musical aspect of his albums has always been crafted by the members of his band, especially the guitarists: Iommi first, then Rhoads, Lee, and Wylde. As far as the music itself is concerned, it's clear that the first albums with Sabbath are a story of their own (with good reason for Starblazer, who never misses an opportunity to demonstrate his complete musical incompetence): innovative, deranged, visionary, dark, shocking for the time. Before that, no one had ever thought to play like that, no one; make sure you get that straight. From Sabbath came thrash, doom, grunge, and many other extreme music genres. It's all in those first 4 or 5 albums, all right there.
As for Ozzy as a solo artist, the story is different: he has always been managed (100%) by his wife, who chose musicians, producers, image, etc. for him. All of his albums up to No More Tears are excellent, some truly outstanding, regardless of personal tastes: Ozzy's voice is what it is, but it has an evocative power that few can afford. Everything else is pure marketing, but that's fine; the music business is also this.

A record that alternates between great moments and somewhat soporific pauses: poorly produced, it suffers from a lack of structure and organization. For the rest, I see that, as far as "ozzi" are concerned, the previous comments are rife with ignorance. Things that happen.

Enough, guys, please... I have a suggestion: review the bootlegs, at least you’ll be doing something new, but the albums, come on, no more...

Objectively and without controversy: was it really necessary? Moreover, the review is pitiful... I mean, we need at least a bit of objectivity, guys, come on...

@rivoli
Aside from the fact that poh are a band that deserves the utmost respect, can you please stop bothering us with your nonsense? Come on, be good...

@little man
And so, if we're really going to say it all, from 35 onwards they're the raunchiest of them all :D

@captain
Yes, you're right, I meant Maiden England (which I have on VHS and I watched dozens of times back then). I would hope for something more, like a Monsters '88...