frank1979

The review is sufficient, the album quite mediocre, it strays from the Iron Maiden's norms because instead of metal it has hard rock tones. TWO POINTS TO MAKE: The first concerns the reviewer when he says "LET ME TELL YOU, THE LIFE OF AN ARTIST IS HARD," but WHY, EXCUSE ME, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU, HUH?? WELL, FUCK YOU, DON'T GIVE US A HARD TIME! THE SECOND POINT IS FOR THAT SUKAMINKIA FACE OF "PEREZ" WHO SAYS IT'S THE WORST ALBUM... IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN WHAT SHOULD THOSE LIQUID SHIT ALBUMS LIKE "VIRTUAL IX" AND "DANCE OF DEATH" BE?? YOU'RE A BASTARD SON OF SUKAMINKIA WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND ANYTHING!

I messed up issuing the judgments, damn it!!!

Sufficient review of a decent album; in my opinion, it's the last acceptable work from the Maiden. Those who criticize it too much don't understand a damn thing and just complain all fucking day.

A candid and sincere review; talking too much about this album would be a waste of time, just like the Iron Maiden are wasting time by not breaking up. It's enough now; the era has changed... they would look better if they retired. They have already created their masterpieces.

Even though for me the best is "let there be rock."

What the hell does it say recorded several years later? Bon Scott died in February '80 and the album came out the same year… a shitty review with huge mistakes. An album that confirms itself as a cornerstone of the genre par excellence.

The review is written discreetly; however, I completely disagree with how it presents the album—it's not the best at all. Although it would be a bit bold to qualify it as a full-fledged album, it would be better described as an EP... in fact, it was released after High Voltage, which is officially recognized as the first true album. Yes, the tracks are nice... the reinterpretation of the song "Baby Please Don't Go," a cover of the eponymous piece by a certain Williams if I remember correctly, is charming as well. The original track is from 1944, if my memory serves me right. Anyway, I believe AC/DC has done much better work. The rating is too exaggerated; it's a little project put together by the record label with some covers and tracks thrown together. If we give this a 4, then what do we assign to an album like "Let There Be Rock," which I believe is the best—do we give it a 20?

This album is labeled as the best just because the story of the drug addict playing the guitar is fashionable and nothing more... in fact, this novelty of the "concept album" is new for many people, anyway if they have done it, it turns out to be lacking; there are far better concept albums... musically, I also find it poor in ideas, I’ve had this CD in my hands twice and I’ve given it away both times. It’s excessively boring... the true masterpieces of Savatage are to be found elsewhere.

Sorry, I made a mistake. Anyway, it's okay that I rated the album... AND by the way, I just don't understand these reviewers. They only mention the most terrible albums, except for "Hall of the Mountain King" (which isn't even their best). They don't even mention the TRUE MASTERPIECES OF SAVATAGE, which are "Sirens" and "The Dungeons Are Calling." The band gained recognition worldwide for their originality thanks to these albums... you don't understand a damn thing about music, go fuck yourselves.

OH, what’s with all of you and this “Streets”?? You think it’s great just because you’ve been brainwashed into believing that concept albums have to be the best of all time! You’re a bunch of fucking ignorant assholes. “Streets” may be a concept album, but musically it sucks and it's also poor in ideas, not to mention boring; there have definitely been better concept albums made. I don’t know this album “Handful of Rain,” so I can’t vote for it, but the review that sucks, I can vote on that.