erik

I’ve never really understood Scaruffi; he certainly can’t have listened attentively and understood all these albums well. Some of his album definitions are astonishing and completely wrong...

Somewhere to mess around, they did a mathematical calculation on Scaruffi: the result is that even if he had only listened to music 24 hours a day, it is physically impossible for him to have listened to all those records he claims.

It's too easy to take shots at Scaruffi... by now we know it's also pointless to keep mentioning him...

Perhaps, for someone who cites a lot of data and almost no opinions (hardly any), it's not necessary to have listened to all the albums one hundred sixty-three times. There’s the Zanichelli dictionary (horrible), there’s Allmusic, there’s Ondarock, each one is garbage in its own way: you need to understand what kind of garbage you need. If you want someone to tell you whether an album is good/bad/pleasant/unpleasant, surely you shouldn’t turn to Piero. Piero is there to tell you whether an album is innovative/original/well-known/the same as a thousand others, etc. All things he himself says, huh.

The most frustrating thing about this man is that he expects one listen to uncover the essence of an album... but how is that even possible?

Here, I definitely need to explore further, I will definitely take care of it.

I listened to some of your early works too. Much more electronic, in my opinion it's worth diving deeper into this.

The most beautiful album I have listened to in this 2014, now coming to an end... "in this field," the problem is that this album cannot fit into any category, music so pure (that encompasses Western sacred music, "mystical Eastern" elements, and psychedelia) I don't know of any... unfortunately...