Kino

Your comment on the chart

Comments on this chart

• 

  hjhhjij

  2 dec 13

  Said by you: "Drugs
  Real artists don’t need them, useful only for mediocre artists." You ranked the best with a bunch of mediocre ones, so... come on, you need to have consistency, though, damn.

   

  •  Love (01)
  •  Hate (00)
  • (00)
  • (00)
• 

  hjhhjij

  2 dec 13

  Who knows what substances caused Buckley to write a wonderful piece like "Pleasent Street," and whether Starsailor (one of the most beautiful, important, and inspired albums ever) had him relying on something... mmm... I think so. I wonder what Young was using during the period of despair from which he pulled out "Tonight's The Night" and "On the Beach." And so on. This would be a beautiful ranking, but you overexposed yourself last time, I'm sorry. Then maybe you’ll respond that they didn’t need drugs because they are geniuses and were inspired, thus bringing up the argument I’ve made 67 times that you’ve never understood.

   

  •  Love (00)
  •  Hate (00)
  • (00)
  • (00)
• 

  hjhhjij

  2 dec 13

  Trying to cancel out your bullshit about the drugs/inspiration relationship, I say that obviously this ranking of the best singer-songwriters (because that's what it seems to me, apart from Bowie but even he is nonetheless a songwriter) is undoubtedly beautiful. Waits, Buckley, and Drake are everything to me, Young, Cohen, Dylan, and Morrison obviously among the greatest of all time. Springsteen up to Nebraska (+ Tom Joad) I really like, Bowie in the '70s is indisputable. I only don’t know Smith, just a couple of songs, which are, by the way, beautiful. I don’t see a Joni Mitchell or a Lisa Germano or a Nick Cave, the first names that come to mind quickly, just to add something.

   

  •  Love (00)
  •  Hate (00)
  • (00)
  • (00)
• 

  +)xAx(-

  24 jan 14

  hjhjj, are you seriously listening to this idiot?

   

  •  Love (00)
  •  Hate (00)
  • (00)
  • (00)