Worst artist of all time
<b>The Clash</b>

1

The Clash

rock per bimbiminkia
<b>The Beatles</b>

2

The Beatles

la sublimazione della banalità
<b>The Rolling Stones</b>

3

The Rolling Stones

incapaci
<b>Emerson, Lake & Palmer</b>

6

Emerson, Lake & Palmer

segaioli
<b>David Bowie</b>

9

David Bowie

...ma poi innovatore de che? ahahahaha
<b>Bruce Springsteen</b>

11

Bruce Springsteen

nullità ontologica 2
<b>Oasis</b>

12

Oasis

nullità ontologiche 3
Your comment on the chart
Comments on this chart
  • j&r
    j&r
    9 feb 12
    Here’s another obvious example of total mental confusion: to skillfully mix and confuse true art with complete crap... I would even include Al Bano and Beethoven, and then it would be perfect...
     
  • Felo
    Felo
    9 feb 12
    Anyway, whether Bowie is an innovator or not, he shouldn't be discarded, quite the opposite... I won't comment on the Stones.
     
  • trouble
    trouble
    9 feb 12
    j&r, to advise me to add Beethoven, it must really be you who is a little confused.
     
  • Mr. Money87
    Mr. Money87
    9 feb 12
    It takes a certain amount of imagination to place the Rolling Stones and Oasis in the same ranking.
     
  • j&r
    j&r
    9 feb 12
    trouble, it was a provocation!... I thought no clarifications were needed... saying to add "al bano and beethoven" is like saying to include in the same ranking a terrible artist and a sublime one... just like you did mixing stones with acdc and oasis...
     
  • effedici
    effedici
    9 feb 12
    What the hell are you talking about?
     
  • fedezan76
    fedezan76
    9 feb 12
    One of the few times I agree with j&r.
     
  • Felo
    Felo
    9 feb 12
    But then again, you know, j&r hates Beethoven. Anyway, the most serious thing is having put the Stones before Oasis.
     
Similar users
siamosoloio

DeAge 4851

BARRACUDA BLUE

DeRank™: 4,37

XxFusRoDah90xX

DeAge 4852

surofficial

DeAge 4852