indeed, for better or worse, they have been fundamental..........of course, Lee Lewis, Little Richard, BB King and Co. laid the true foundations of the genre, while the Rolling Stones created the premises for a more "expanded" mainstream........... more
Useless? Remove the definitions!!! more
overrated like few. more
Fuck the project managers of this shit. more
highs and lows, after all we are human, but when even the low moments are unattainable for 95% of colleagues... more
Never liked more
Tonight Rolling Stronz sold out at the retirement home in Fregene. more
Absolutely better than the Rolling Stones more
Absolutely better than the Beatles... more
caparezza what sadness more
well... they are crazy... however enjoyable, much groovier than other extreme bands... MATANDO GUEROS!!! more
words are truly superfluous more
But has anyone ever really assessed them? more
Overrated. more
absolutely better than the Beatles! more
a silent solitude creates stagnant anguish more
better than the Beatles! more
it's only rock n' roll but we like it!!!!!! more
Not even Caparezza saved on Debaser...what a drag. more
The alleged relevance of the Beatles is mostly due to their lavish production, which is no small factor. As far as I’m concerned, they age terribly. Even though they drew from the rock music of those years, they have always completely remained outside of it. Champions of pop, period. more