I won't talk about this album because it would be easy to rave about it.
I won't talk about this album because I really want to understand its importance in the world of Californian punk straddling the '70s and '80s. Actually, I'm not interested in discussing the songs on this album, or how they changed punk history. What I'm interested in is comparing it with the quintessential Flag album, 'My War'.
Because, according to my thesis, 'Damaged' hasn't historically influenced the world of music like the Black Sabbath-style 'My War'. Let me state first that Damaged is an excellent work, but songs like Can't decide (I don't know English, but I don't give a damn) are fantastic because they foreshadowed the raw grunge of Bleach, or Melvins' Ozma, years ahead. In this album, the hardness, the slowness, and the brutality of the sound, anticipates for years, works like Superfuzz by M., or sheds light on sonic obsessions like those from Tad or even gives early insights into stoner.
An album like 'Damaged' — is it really that decisive? And, above all, has it genuinely influenced artists like Nirvana, or the Melvins, or the M., or was 'My War' more instrumental? Kurt Cobain always said that Damaged inspired him, but maybe that album was 'My War'... People have accused me of writing provocative and shitty reviews, yet I keep going down this path because I believe life is made of provocation and also paradoxes.
How can it seem like a paradox to say that 'My War' is better than 'Damaged'?
Black Flag were THE band, who best interpreted what was the only possible approach English punk could have in the metropolises of California.
A loud, sweaty, and revealing Fuck You to what was shaping up to mystify the America of the Golden-Boy graduate, careerist, sexist.