Stuart Beattie
I, Frankenstein

THE REVIEW

We find ourselves 200 years after his birth (or rather, creation) assessing the work and soul of Dr. Frankenstein's son (?).

It doesn't seem like anything new (and indeed it isn't), it doesn't seem like anything interesting (and indeed it isn't), it doesn't seem like anything worth talking about (and indeed it isn't), but then why am I sitting in front of a keyboard? Simple: I would like to spare you 93 minutes of boredom and deja vu.

Let's say that the screenplay, cinematography, and special effects are not among the worst, but certainly nothing exceptional.

The plot resumes the eternal struggle between the forces of good and the forces of evil, between Gargoyles and Demons, respectively: Adam, that’s the name of the creature (perhaps a biblical reference to the first man?, because he is the first and the only one of his kind), is in search of his identity and his soul!

I've run out of considerations, not that there was much to elaborate on: anyway, you can always verify it in the field if you don't trust me...