This new way of writing, collaborating with AI, and even playing with the irony of perfectionism represents a direction that, whether we like it or not, is already taking shape and will likely be part of the future of communication. Today, it is often viewed with suspicion, as if it were a deviation from “real” writing, but in reality, it’s simply an evolution of the way ideas are developed, refined, and shared.
What is criticized as artificial or overly controlled may, over time, be recognized as a new aesthetic: not the replacement of human thought, but its extension—a dialogue between intention and technological support. The irony about perfectionism, then, is not a denial of quality, but an awareness of its limits and its obsessions.
Perhaps today we are not yet fully ready for this transformation. Every radical change initially tends to generate resistance, because it challenges established habits and already settled criteria for judgment. But what seems controversial today may simply be normal tomorrow.
As Marcel Proust wrote, “The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes.” Perhaps that is precisely the point: it is not writing that is changing, but the way we look at it. estetica: punto: